Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
Merged
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion Cargo.toml
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ check-cfg = [
"cfg(ldk_test_vectors)",
"cfg(taproot)",
"cfg(require_route_graph_test)",
"cfg(splicing)",
"cfg(simple_close)",
"cfg(peer_storage)",
]
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions ci/ci-tests.sh
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ fi
echo -e "\n\nTest cfg-flag builds"
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=taproot" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=splicing" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=async_payments" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
[ "$CI_MINIMIZE_DISK_USAGE" != "" ] && cargo clean
RUSTFLAGS="--cfg=simple_close" cargo test --verbose --color always -p lightning
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -742,11 +742,8 @@ mod tests {
fn handle_open_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &OpenChannelV2) {}
fn handle_accept_channel_v2(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &AcceptChannelV2) {}
fn handle_stfu(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &Stfu) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_init(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceInit) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_ack(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceAck) {}
#[cfg(splicing)]
fn handle_splice_locked(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &SpliceLocked) {}
fn handle_tx_add_input(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddInput) {}
fn handle_tx_add_output(&self, _their_node_id: PublicKey, _msg: &TxAddOutput) {}
Expand Down
46 changes: 30 additions & 16 deletions lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3399,26 +3399,35 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

// Prune HTLCs from the previous counterparty commitment tx so we don't generate failure/fulfill
// events for now-revoked/fulfilled HTLCs.
if let Some(txid) = self.funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&self.funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
for (_, ref source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
let mut removed_fulfilled_htlcs = false;
let prune_htlc_sources = |funding: &mut FundingScope| {
if let Some(txid) = funding.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid.take() {
if funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap() != txid {
let cur_claimables = funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(
&funding.current_counterparty_commitment_txid.unwrap()).unwrap();
// We only need to remove fulfilled HTLCs once for the first `FundingScope` we
// come across since all `FundingScope`s share the same set of HTLC sources.
if !removed_fulfilled_htlcs {
for (_, ref source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap() {
if let Some(source) = source_opt {
if !cur_claimables.iter()
.any(|(_, cur_source_opt)| cur_source_opt == source_opt)
{
self.counterparty_fulfilled_htlcs.remove(&SentHTLCId::from_source(source));
}
}
}
removed_fulfilled_htlcs = true;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just run the loop below at this point and return rather than needing this variable?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's just a small optimization to not remove HTLCs that have already been removed since we have duplicate data across FundingScopes. The loop below does need to run for every FundingScope though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, but that is already inside the closure, which is called on each FundingScope.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind. Didn't see that removed_fulfilled_htlcs is used across all calls.

}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
for &mut (_, ref mut source_opt) in self.funding.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get_mut(&txid).unwrap() {
*source_opt = None;
}
} else {
assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "Commitment txids are unique outside of fuzzing, where hashes can collide");
}
}
};
core::iter::once(&mut self.funding).chain(&mut self.pending_funding).for_each(prune_htlc_sources);

if !self.payment_preimages.is_empty() {
let min_idx = self.get_min_seen_secret();
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -4049,6 +4058,7 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {

mem::swap(&mut self.funding, &mut new_funding);
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
self.funding.channel_parameters.clone(),
self.funding.current_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
self.funding.prev_holder_commitment_tx.clone(),
);
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -5164,6 +5174,10 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
log_trace!(logger, "Transaction {} confirmed in block {}", txid , block_hash);
// If a transaction has already been confirmed, ensure we don't bother processing it duplicatively.
if self.alternative_funding_confirmed.map(|(alternative_funding_txid, _)| alternative_funding_txid == txid).unwrap_or(false) {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
}
if Some(txid) == self.funding_spend_confirmed {
log_debug!(logger, "Skipping redundant processing of funding-spend tx {} as it was previously confirmed", txid);
continue 'tx_iter;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -1236,11 +1236,14 @@ impl<ChannelSigner: EcdsaChannelSigner> OnchainTxHandler<ChannelSigner> {
self.prev_holder_commitment = Some(replace(&mut self.holder_commitment, tx));
}

/// Replaces the current/prev holder commitment transactions spending the currently confirmed
/// funding outpoint with those spending the new funding outpoint.
/// Replaces all the data pertaining to the currently locked funding transaction after a new
/// funding transaction has been renegotiated and locked.
pub(crate) fn update_after_renegotiated_funding_locked(
&mut self, current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
&mut self, channel_parameters: ChannelTransactionParameters,
current: HolderCommitmentTransaction, prev: Option<HolderCommitmentTransaction>,
) {
self.channel_value_satoshis = channel_parameters.channel_value_satoshis;
self.channel_transaction_parameters = channel_parameters;
self.holder_commitment = current;
self.prev_holder_commitment = prev;
}
Expand Down
Loading
Loading