Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged

Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Oct 28, 2025•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 28, 2025•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2025
Merged
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-10-fiz-fuzz branch 5 times, most recently from 8bfffb2 to 1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull reviewed Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh Outdated
# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml

@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️

@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Oct 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt changed the title Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull

tnull commented Oct 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.

It's failing in CI with a linking error though?

@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Oct 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Oct 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder

Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-10-fiz-fuzz branch 2 times, most recently from 535d546 to 8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).

@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit cbbda61 into lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025
26 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations - #4179
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Nov 10, 2025
Merged
Make fuzz runtime seconds not iterations#4179
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
TheBlueMatt:2025-10-fiz-fuzz
Conversation
@TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Oct 28, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (e42e74e) to head (8015c01).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4179 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.33% 89.33% =======================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138055 138055 Branches 138055 138055 =======================================
+ Hits 123326 123335 +9 + Misses 12122 12121 -1 + Partials 2607 2599 -8 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing33.58% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
tests88.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
mentioned this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
 Merged

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8bfffb2 to
1ba5defCompareOctober 28, 2025 02:02
tnull
tnull
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment threadfuzz/ci-fuzz.sh
Outdated

# Because we're fuzzing relatively few iterations, the maximum possible
# compiler optimizations aren't necessary, so we turn off LTO
sed -i 's/lto = true//' Cargo.toml
sed -i 's/codegen-units = 1//' Cargo.toml
@tnulltnullOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #3916 we made some attempts of benchmarking before we removed this line. Do you have a vague number of how much the slowdown would be?
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMattOct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot about that, but its almost certainly a tiny difference in fuzzing performance, for a bit more parallelism while compiling some crates. 🤷‍♂️
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now. Now this just reduces the runtime to make it more consistent across jobs.
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt
changed the title
Fix fuzzing CI and tweak runtimeMake fuzz runtime seconds not iterationsOct 28, 2025
@tnull
tnull
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Oh, weird, I guess bumping the debian version fixed the build even with 1.75, which I thought I tested....anyway, I dropped the MSRV bump for fuzzing cause it appears to be woring now.
It's failing in CI with a linking error though?
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 29, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Weird, it seems to be inconsistent, sometimes its fine, sometimes it fails.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Oct 30, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
The fuzz job seems to be pretty consistently passing on the builds on git main so for now i think we should just land this as-is.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 1, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 3, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 5, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 8, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔔 6th Reminder
Hey @wpaulino! This PR has been waiting for your review.

Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.
@TheBlueMatt
Use honggfuzz's --run-time arg to limit per-fuzz runtime in CI
8015c01
We have some complexity in `ci-fuzz.sh` to limit each fuzzer to a
rough runtime, but `honggfuzz` has a `--run-time` argument that we
can simply use instead, which we do here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed
the
2025-10-fiz-fuzz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
535d546 to
8015c01CompareNovember 10, 2025 19:57
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
Hum, I guess the codegen-units = 1 is required to make the test pass, so I dropped that commit (though it shouldn't be required...).
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
commented
Nov 10, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
This is now only making the fuzz iterations consistent, which we should do, but is much less important.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt
merged commit cbbda61
into
lightningdevkit:mainNov 10, 2025

26 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tnulltnulltnull left review comments
@wpaulinowpaulinowpaulino approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull@wpaulino