Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Backport 4234 to 0.2 - #4239

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Backport 4234 to 0.2#4239
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.2from
benthecarman:0.2-4234

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backports #4234

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 69.04762% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (a20e68d) to head (0075d5a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.2.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel_state.rs46.66%8 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs50.00%4 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 0.2 #4239 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.85% 88.86% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 180 180 Lines 138003 138042 +39 Branches 138003 138042 +39 ==========================================
+ Hits 122619 122675 +56 + Misses 12562 12551 -11 + Partials 2822 2816 -6 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.44% <46.66%> (+0.59%)⬆️
tests88.71% <69.04%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wpaulinowpaulino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TheBlueMatt up to you if you want to include it this late in the cycle

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this needs a rebase.

Also, I want to note that this breaks SemVer rules as adding new fields to enum variants are considered major changes.

So not sure we can/should actually land this in a patch release?

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is not meant to go in a patch release as 0.2 does not have a final release yet.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

Original context and motivation comes from here: lightningdevkit/ldk-node#677 (comment)
When splicing-in, the default case is our channel utxo + our wallet utxos
being combined. This works great however, it can give our wallet issues
calculating fees after the fact because our wallet needs to know about
our channel's utxo. We currently have it's outpoint and satoshi value
available, but not its output script so we are unable to construct the
TxOut for the channel. This adds the redeem script to the
`ChannelDetails` and `ChannelPending` event which gives us enough
information to be able to construct it.
Backport of add202e
@benthecarman

benthecarman commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please include the suffix we generally include in backported commits - add Backport of original-commit-sha to the end and note any conflicts which had to be resolved.

rebased and done, there were no conflicts

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a16bec0 into lightningdevkit:0.2Dec 2, 2025
25 checks passed
@benthecarman
benthecarman deleted the 0.2-4234 branch December 2, 2025 16:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@tnull