Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426

Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

Conversation

@wpaulino

@wpaulinowpaulino commented Feb 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.

Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.

@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.3 milestone Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino self-assigned this Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 19, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 19, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino

wpaulino commented Feb 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Merging with one approval since this is trivial

@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 4f8ab7b into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026
21 of 22 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice branch February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2026
Closed
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2026
Open
50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice - #4426
Merged
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice#4426
wpaulino merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom 
wpaulino:no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice
Conversation
@wpaulino
@wpaulinowpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in attempting to become quiescent.
Found by the chanmon_consistency fuzzer.
@wpaulino
Avoid sending stfu for quiescent splice action while pending splice
15b04b5
We can't splice while one is already pending, so there's no point in
attempting to become quiescent.
@wpaulinowpaulino
added this to the 0.3 milestone
Feb 19, 2026
@wpaulino
wpaulino
requested a review
from jkczyzFebruary 19, 2026 00:26
@wpaulinowpaulino
self-assigned this
Feb 19, 2026
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @jkczyz as a reviewer!

I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.

Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Feb 19, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (153e57e) to head (15b04b5).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4426 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.91% =======================================
Files 156 156 Lines 103965 103972 +7 Branches 103965 103972 +7 =======================================
+ Hits 89316 89326 +10 
Misses 12128 12128 + Partials 2521 2518 -3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: 
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@ldk-reviews-bot
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!
Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.
@wpaulino
wpaulino
commented
Feb 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Merging with one approval since this is trivial
@wpaulino
wpaulino
merged commit 4f8ab7b
into
lightningdevkit:mainFeb 19, 2026

21 of 22 checks passed

@wpaulino
wpaulino
deleted the

no-stfu-send-while-pending-splice

branch
February 19, 2026 17:26
@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026

Closed

@jkczyzjkczyz
mentioned this pull request
Mar 19, 2026

Open

50 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jkczyzjkczyzjkczyz approved these changes

Assignees

@wpaulinowpaulino

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone

0.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@jkczyz