Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status - #4445

Closed
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze
Closed

Return Result from Watch::update_channel to separate monitor failure from persistence status#4445
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
joostjager:fix-freeze

Conversation

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…from persistence status
Change Watch::update_channel to return Result<ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, ()>
instead of bare ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus. This cleanly separates two
distinct concerns that were previously conflated:
- Ok(status): the persistence status (Completed, InProgress, or
UnrecoverableError), representing whether the monitor was durably
persisted.
- Err(()): ChannelMonitor::update_monitor failed internally, generally
implying the channel has been closed on-chain.
Previously, ChainMonitor would override the Persist result to InProgress
when update_monitor failed, repurposing the async persistence mechanism
to freeze the channel. This was problematic because it could switch a
synchronous persister's channel into async mode, violating the
expectation that Completed and InProgress modes are not mixed.
Now, ChainMonitor returns Err(()) when update_monitor fails, and
ChannelManager maps this to InProgress behavior internally to freeze
the channel with minimal diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! I see this is a draft PR.
I'll wait to assign reviewers until you mark it as ready for review.
Just convert it out of draft status when you're ready for review!

@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.96%. Comparing base (14e522f) to head (3ec6081).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4445 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 85.96% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 159 159 Lines 104644 104649 +5 Branches 104644 104649 +5 ==========================================
+ Hits 89934 89960 +26 + Misses 12204 12185 -19 + Partials 2506 2504 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests85.96% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing because of incompatibility with future remote chain monitor impls

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@joostjager@ldk-reviews-bot