Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError - #4609

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason
May 11, 2026
Merged

Include NegotiationFailureReason in InteractiveTxMsgError#4609
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Each SpliceNegotiationFailed event originating from an InteractiveTxMsgError needs a NegotiationFailureReason, so it makes sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the NegotiationFailureReason included uses the NegotiationError variant, but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as LocallyCanceled after calling ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed.

Fixes#4490 (comment)

Each `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event originating from an
`InteractiveTxMsgError` needs a `NegotiationFailureReason`, so it makes
sense to track it in the same place. In most cases, the
`NegotiationFailureReason` included uses the `NegotiationError` variant,
but other cases may require their own specific variant, such as
`LocallyCanceled` after calling
`ChannelManager::cancel_funding_contributed`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from TheBlueMattMay 8, 2026 18:07
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff and explored the relevant codebase context. This is a clean refactoring that moves NegotiationFailureReason into InteractiveTxMsgError rather than passing it as a separate parameter to handle_interactive_tx_msg_err.

Key verification points:

  • The into_parts() fallback via reason_from_channel_error produces the same output as the old inline format!("{:?}", err.err) — both format the ChannelError with its Debug impl.
  • The one call site that previously passed Some(LocallyCanceled) (the cancel_funding_contributed handler) now has the reason embedded in both branches of cancel_funding_contributed() in channel.rs.
  • All other call sites previously passed None, so the fallback behavior is unchanged.
  • All 6 call sites of handle_interactive_tx_msg_err are updated to the new 4-parameter signature.
  • The borrow pattern in into_parts() (borrowing err in the .map() closure then moving it into the return tuple) is correct — the borrow is released when .map() completes.

No issues found.

@codecov

codecovBot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.37037% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.11%. Comparing base (8882edd) to head (946ee09).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs67.34%16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4609 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.12% 86.11% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 157 157 Lines 108824 108841 +17 Branches 108824 108841 +17 ==========================================
+ Hits 93721 93725 +4 - Misses 12487 12497 +10 - Partials 2616 2619 +3 
FlagCoverage Δ
tests86.11% <70.37%> (-0.01%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 783c280 into lightningdevkit:mainMay 11, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the interactive-tx-msg-err-negotiation-failure-reason branch May 11, 2026 19:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@ldk-claude-review-bot@TheBlueMatt