Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix build warnings - #599

Closed
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings
Closed

Fix build warnings#599
D4nte wants to merge 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:masterfrom
D4nte:build-warnings

Conversation

@D4nte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have noticed few build warnings on master and I thought I'd give a go at suppressing them. So far I have not changed any software behaviour, just removed unused parentheses and removed the warning using an allow attribute.

I have justified the used of the allow attribute in the commit.
Do you prefer justifying the use of allow attribute with in code comments?

Also, I assume that we are keeping the used of description() in purpose. Let me know if you'd prefer to see an implementation and use of the Display trait instead (as per Rust's recommendation).

I have not removed the warning warning: field is never read: 'logger' for ChainWatchInterfaceUtil and KeysManager because indeed, it is never read and I cannot seem to grasp why this field is present.

Some guidance would be greatly appreciated 🙂

D4nte added 3 commits April 20, 2020 09:43
As per Rust's convention, this allows the removal of a build
warning.
While `Error::description()` usage is deprecated, it allows
us to define static string slices for the various error messages.
Until more advance formatting is needed, it is better to use `description`
instead of the `Display` trait as recommended
by Rust.
This also removes a build warning.
`ToString::to_string()` should be favored in place of
the deprecated `Error::description()` trait function.
However, using `to_string` adds a heap allocation due to its
use of dynamic type `String`.
It should be noted that std::io::Error provides a richer context
in the `Display` trait implementation in the deprecated
`description` one. By electing to use `description`, we consciously
choose to stay in the stack over usability.
This also removes a build warning.
@D4nteD4nte changed the title Build warningsFix build warningsApr 20, 2020
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt commented Apr 20, 2020 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#594 was merged, so gonna close this. As for the missing logger reads, those were added cause we figured we'd have something worth logging. We probably do, in fact, have things worth logging, we just never do. I think the right fix is to log something at least at the trace level.

@D4nte
D4nte deleted the build-warnings branch April 22, 2020 03:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@D4nte@TheBlueMatt