Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Make errors actionable when failing to deserialize a ChannelManager - #976
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #976 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.63% 90.47% -0.16%
==========================================
Files 60 60 Lines 30538 30607 +69 ==========================================
+ Hits 27678 27692 +14 - Misses 2860 2915 +55
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We changed the sort order of log levels to be more natural, but this comparison wasn't updated accordingly. Likely the reason it was left strange for so long is it also had the comparison argument ordering flipped.
b918220 to
e8110abCompareTheBlueMatt
commented
Jun 30, 2021
Squashed without diff: |
ariard
commented
Jun 30, 2021
ACK e8110ab For the records about e8110ab, it has been there since #91 : https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-lightning/pull/91/files#diff-8b7223022de62dd3acad8a134eb6fc1cb291b0144df8fb0bb63c454860471a77R167 |
TheBlueMatt
commented
Jul 1, 2021
That specific code yes, but I naively swapped the sort order of log levels in #965, which caused the regression. |
See #965 (comment)