[CI bisect — do not review] INR schema change minus rail property by ls-bolt[bot] · Pull Request #650 · lightsparkdev/grid-api

ls-bolt · 2026-07-06T21:55:41Z

Claim this PR — take ownership under your GitHub account

Throwaway diagnostic PR — do not review, will be closed shortly.

Bisecting the chronic Build SDKs for pull request / preview csharp failure on #646 (and #644): this branch carries the exact INR schema change from #646minus the new rail property, to determine whether rail is what breaks the Stainless csharp SDK build.

csharp preview goes green here → rail is the breaker
csharp preview stays red → the breakage is elsewhere in the schema change

Context: #646's preview failed twice with csharp: Your SDK build had a failure in the build CI job, which is a regression from the base state, as did auto-sync #644 which carries the same INR fields.

Slack thread: https://lightsparkgroup.slack.com/archives/D0BCM1RUHHU/p1783372549749679

🤖 bonded-titan (#1) | Feedback

vercel · 2026-07-06T21:55:45Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
grid-flow-builder	Ignored	Preview	Jul 6, 2026 10:16pm
grid-wallet-demo	Ignored	Preview	Jul 6, 2026 10:16pm

akanter · 2026-07-06T21:56:03Z

[CI bisect — do not review] INR schema change minus rail property #650 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

github-actions · 2026-07-06T21:56:13Z

✱ Stainless preview builds for grid

This PR will update the grid SDKs with the following commit messages.

cli

chore(internal): regenerate SDK with no functional changes

csharp

feat(api): add account_number/bank_name/ifsc fields, neft/rtgs rails to inr external accounts

go

feat(api): add accountNumber/bankName/ifsc, make vpa optional in InrExternalAccountCreateInfo

kotlin

feat(api): add accountNumber/bankName/ifsc, NEFT/RTGS rails to INR accounts, make vpa optional

openapi

feat(api): add accountNumber/ifsc/bankName fields, NEFT/RTGS rails to InrAccountInfo

php

feat(api): add accountNumber/bankName/ifsc fields, NEFT/RTGS rails to INR accounts

python

feat(api): add account_number/bank_name/ifsc fields, make vpa optional in INR external account

ruby

feat(api): add account_number/bank_name/ifsc fields, NEFT/RTGS rails to INR accounts

typescript

feat(api): add NEFT/RTGS payment rails and account fields to INR external accounts

Edit this comment to update them. They will appear in their respective SDK's changelogs.

✅ grid-openapistudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️

✅ grid-rubystudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ✅ → test ✅

✅ grid-gostudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ → test ❗
go get github.com/stainless-sdks/grid-go@d6d7c5575ac765d896370605b50fcf2161c79c3b

✅ grid-kotlinstudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ✅ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ❗

⚠️

grid-typescriptstudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had a failure in the lint CI job, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ✅ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ✅
npm install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/grid-typescript/14610bb8c5a59a7526889f95f460bd8a1040e69d/dist.tar.gz

⚠️

grid-pythonstudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had a failure in the lint CI job, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ✅ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ❗
pip install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/grid-python/aebad761299d5cbc3d99cc5e33489187dcf5417b/grid-0.0.1-py3-none-any.whl

⚠️

grid-csharpstudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had a failure in the build CI job, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ⚠️ → build ❗ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ✅ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ❗

✅ grid-phpstudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

✅ grid-clistudio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ❗ → lint ❗ → test ❗

This comment is auto-generated by GitHub Actions and is automatically kept up to date as you push.
If you push custom code to the preview branch, re-run this workflow to update the comment.
Last updated: 2026-07-06 22:20:45 UTC

ls-bolt · 2026-07-06T22:02:14Z

Round 1 result: csharp still failed with the full change minus rail — rail is not the breaker.

Round 2 (this push): branch now carries only the paymentRails enum addition (NEFT/RTGS) on InrAccountInfo — no new properties, vpa still required.

🤖 bonded-titan (#1) | Feedback

ls-bolt · 2026-07-06T22:08:58Z

Round 2 result: csharp failed on the enum-only diff (+NEFT/+RTGS, 2 lines) — a shape that already exists on EUR/DKK (SEPA, SEPA_INSTANT) and builds fine on main. The INR content is looking innocent.

Round 3 (this push): zero schema changes — a one-word edit to info.description ("full" → "complete"). If csharp still fails, ANY freshly-generated csharp build is currently broken in Stainless, and every spec-touching grid-api PR will go red regardless of content.

🤖 bonded-titan (#1) | Feedback

…iption), no structural changes (do not review)

ls-bolt · 2026-07-06T22:16:12Z

Round 3 result: csharp passed on the info.description one-word edit — but that edit likely produces zero delta in generated csharp code, so Stainless may have reused a cached build. Not yet conclusive.

Round 4 (this push): a field-description-only change (GTQ bankName description) — semantically trivial but lands in generated doc comments, forcing fresh csharp codegen + CI.

Fails → any freshly-generated csharp build is broken in Stainless (content-independent, Add INR bank (NEFT/RTGS) fields to the INR account schema #646 exonerated)
Passes → something in the INR schema semantics specifically trips csharp

🤖 bonded-titan (#1) | Feedback

ls-bolt · 2026-07-06T22:21:49Z

Round 4 result: csharp failed on a description-only change (GTQ bankName doc string). Conclusion proven:

The Stainless csharp target fails its build CI for ANY freshly-generated code right now, regardless of content. Diffs that don't change generated csharp (docs-only PRs, info.description tweaks) pass because Stainless reuses the cached build; anything that regenerates csharp code fails. The breakage window opened between Jul 3 09:10 UTC (#642, last code-changing pass) and Jul 6 18:34 UTC (#644, first of the current failures).

#646 is exonerated — its content is fine (all real spec gates green). The csharp target is unpublished (production_repo: null, nuget: false), so this check has no shipping impact. The actual error needs someone with Stainless Studio access (org lightspark, project grid) or Stainless support.

Closing this diagnostic PR.

🤖 bonded-titan (#1) | Feedback

…#671) ## Summary Removes the csharp target from `.stainless/stainless.yml` so the `Build SDKs for pull request / preview` check stops failing on every spec-changing PR. **Why every spec PR is red**: Stainless's csharp build CI is broken upstream for ANY freshly generated code (content-independent, proven by bisect on #650, breakage window ~Jul 3). The preview check gates on a per-language head-vs-base regression, and with csharp in main's config the base build resolves to a cached pre-breakage csharp *success* — so every fresh head failure counts as a regression → red. **Why this fixes it**: with csharp out of the config on main, base builds have no cached csharp success to regress from — matching outcomes on base and head → "not a regression" → green. Proven end-to-end by probe #659: the exact previously-failing change class (doc-comment-only codegen delta) ran against a csharp-free base and `preview` **passed**. Full mechanics: [investigation writeup](#657 (comment)). **No shipping impact**: the csharp target is unpublished (`production_repo: null`, `publish.nuget: false`). Re-add the block when Stainless fixes their csharp build CI upstream. ## Sequencing (for #657 and other open spec PRs) 1. Merge this PR — **its own `preview` will be red** (its base is current main); merge through it (precedent: #633, #637). 2. Merge/rebase main into open spec PRs (e.g. #657) — their next `preview` run goes green. ## Verification - `make lint` passes; the file matches the exact removal previously validated on the #657 branch (commit 069ad9a) and by probe #659. --- 🤖 [thundering-graviton-3](https://zeus.dev.dev.sparkinfra.net/#/arc?id=thundering-graviton)[(#3)](https://zeus.dev.dev.sparkinfra.net/#/instance?id=thundering-graviton-3) | [Feedback](https://zeus.dev.dev.sparkinfra.net/feedback) Original PR: #663 Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

ls-boltBot added the bolt label Jul 6, 2026

github-actionsBot added the breaking-change Introduces a breaking change to the OpenAPI spec label Jul 6, 2026

ls-boltBotforce-pushed the 07-06-ci-bisect-inr-csharp-no-rail branch from 13aa9e8 to 848999aCompare July 6, 2026 22:02

github-actionsBot removed the breaking-change Introduces a breaking change to the OpenAPI spec label Jul 6, 2026

ls-boltBotforce-pushed the 07-06-ci-bisect-inr-csharp-no-rail branch from 848999a to 912ad46Compare July 6, 2026 22:08

test: CI bisect round 4 — doc-comment-only change (GTQ bankName descr…
b1f940c
…iption), no structural changes (do not review)

ls-boltBotforce-pushed the 07-06-ci-bisect-inr-csharp-no-rail branch from 912ad46 to b1f940cCompare July 6, 2026 22:16

ls-boltBot closed this Jul 6, 2026

ls-boltBot deleted the 07-06-ci-bisect-inr-csharp-no-rail branch July 6, 2026 22:21

benwgold mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2026
Remove the broken Stainless csharp target so spec PRs stop failing CI #671
Merged

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

[CI bisect — do not review] INR schema change minus rail property - #650

[CI bisect — do not review] INR schema change minus rail property#650
ls-bolt[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
07-06-ci-bisect-inr-csharp-no-rail

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026•
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

vercelBot commented Jul 6, 2026•
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

akanter commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Jul 6, 2026•
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

vercelBot commented Jul 6, 2026• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

akanter commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Jul 6, 2026• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✱ Stainless preview builds for grid

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

ls-boltBot commented Jul 6, 2026•
edited
Loading

vercelBot commented Jul 6, 2026•
edited
Loading

github-actionsBot commented Jul 6, 2026•
edited
Loading