Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
docs(phase-3.2): add integration test plan and progress tracking - #1385
docs(phase-3.2): add integration test plan and progress tracking#1385ashleyshaw wants to merge 11 commits into
Conversation
Change status from 'in-progress'/'draft'/'active' to 'complete' across: - README.md: Project overview (in-progress → complete) - PHASE-2B-SKILLS-AUDIT.md: Audit report (draft → complete) - IMPLEMENTATION_NOTES.md: Methodology (active → complete) Phase A (Audit & Evaluation) is 100% complete: - ✅ Batch 1: 5 agents, 125 skills - ✅ Batch 2-3: 11 agents, 252 skills - ✅ Total: 16 agents, 377 skills - ✅ Conflict matrix documented - ✅ Root skills classified (123 → 70 active) Phase B (Planning) and Phase C (Implementation) are upcoming. Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Create PHASE_3_EXECUTION.md: detailed step-by-step implementation guide - Create PHASE_3_ISSUES.md: GitHub issue templates for Phase 3 work items (#3.1-#3.4) - Create PHASE_3_KICKOFF.md: ready-to-execute prompt with context and next steps - Create PHASE_3_READINESS.md: comprehensive readiness report - Update README.md: Phase 3 readiness status and document navigation Phase 3 consolidates 4 labeling workflows into 2 streamlined workflows: - labeling.yml (250 lines) + dependabot-security-label.yml (85 lines) + issue-close-label-hygiene.yml (95 lines) → labeling-governance.yml - metadata-governance.yml (140 lines) unchanged Expected outcomes: - 33-50% workflow reduction (3-4 → 2) - ~180 lines of duplication eliminated - ~20 GHA minutes/week savings - All labeling behavior preserved Timeline: Weeks 9-10 (starts 2026-07-26 upon Phase 2.3 completion) Effort: 6-8 hours (simpler than Phase 2) Status: READY TO START Follows same consolidation pattern as Phase 2, with proven testing and review approach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Document 13 integration test scenarios for Phase 2 - Reference for Mermaid validation testing - Reference for README validation testing - Reference for maintenance workflows testing - Provides testing methodology baseline for future phases Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…cking - PHASE_3.2_TEST_PLAN.md: comprehensive test plan with 5 scenarios and 14 test cases - PHASE_3_PROGRESS.md: overall Phase 3 progress and status tracking These documents support Phase 3.2 integration testing execution for labeling-governance.yml consolidation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in:22 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (15)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🚫 This PR description is missing required template content. Missing required section(s): Linked issues, Changelog, Global DoD checklist Please update the PR body using one of the repository PR templates:
Empty placeholders, unchecked checklist boxes, and stub issue references do not count. |
Pull request was closed
Adds comprehensive continuation prompt to active project folder for use in new chat sessions when continuing work on PR #1377 and Phase 2 execution. Includes: - Current project status and branch references (feat/issue-triage-automation-enhancements) - Epic #1376 and child issues #1378-#1385 - Phase 2 execution steps with exact commands - All relevant documentation locations - Success criteria and verification checklists - Quick reference commands This file allows seamless handoff between chat sessions while maintaining full context of the implementation and execution plan.
* docs(phase-2b): Update frontmatter status to reflect Phase A completion Change status from 'in-progress'/'draft'/'active' to 'complete' across: - README.md: Project overview (in-progress → complete) - PHASE-2B-SKILLS-AUDIT.md: Audit report (draft → complete) - IMPLEMENTATION_NOTES.md: Methodology (active → complete) Phase A (Audit & Evaluation) is 100% complete: - ✅ Batch 1: 5 agents, 125 skills - ✅ Batch 2-3: 11 agents, 252 skills - ✅ Total: 16 agents, 377 skills - ✅ Conflict matrix documented - ✅ Root skills classified (123 → 70 active) Phase B (Planning) and Phase C (Implementation) are upcoming. Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: Phase 3 labeling consolidation — preparation and kickoff - Create PHASE_3_EXECUTION.md: detailed step-by-step implementation guide - Create PHASE_3_ISSUES.md: GitHub issue templates for Phase 3 work items (#3.1-#3.4) - Create PHASE_3_KICKOFF.md: ready-to-execute prompt with context and next steps - Create PHASE_3_READINESS.md: comprehensive readiness report - Update README.md: Phase 3 readiness status and document navigation Phase 3 consolidates 4 labeling workflows into 2 streamlined workflows: - labeling.yml (250 lines) + dependabot-security-label.yml (85 lines) + issue-close-label-hygiene.yml (95 lines) → labeling-governance.yml - metadata-governance.yml (140 lines) unchanged Expected outcomes: - 33-50% workflow reduction (3-4 → 2) - ~180 lines of duplication eliminated - ~20 GHA minutes/week savings - All labeling behavior preserved Timeline: Weeks 9-10 (starts 2026-07-26 upon Phase 2.3 completion) Effort: 6-8 hours (simpler than Phase 2) Status: READY TO START Follows same consolidation pattern as Phase 2, with proven testing and review approach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: Add Phase 2.2 integration test results reference - Document 13 integration test scenarios for Phase 2 - Reference for Mermaid validation testing - Reference for README validation testing - Reference for maintenance workflows testing - Provides testing methodology baseline for future phases Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * auto: .remember 19:25 * auto: .remember 19:41 * auto: .remember 19:57 * auto: .remember 20:37 * auto: .remember 21:20 * feat(issue-triage): add milestone assignment + remediation automation - Create MilestoneAssignmentAgent for intelligent milestone assignment (scripts/agents/includes/milestone-assignment.js) - Create RemediationChecklistGenerator for per-issue DoR/DoD remediation (scripts/agents/includes/remediation-checklist-generator.js) - Add issue-create-enhanced.yml workflow with: * Template-based issue creation * Auto milestone assignment * Parent issue linking * PR linking * Remediation checklist posting - Add issue-remediation-bulk.yml workflow for bulk remediation of non-compliant issues These workflows address the 250-issue compliance gap discovered in recent audit. * docs: add comprehensive issue triage automation guide Covers: - Workflow usage (enhanced issue creation, bulk remediation, labeling) - Milestone assignment rules and confidence scoring - Remediation checklist generation per issue type - Audit results and 250-issue remediation plan - Template enforcement and validation - Agent API documentation - Troubleshooting guide * docs(projects): add issue-triage-automation-system project documentation - Add README.md with role-based navigation (executive, technical lead, contributor) - Add PROJECT_INDEX.md with full project structure and status - Add IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md with 2-phase delivery plan and technical details - Add EXECUTION_CHECKLIST.md with step-by-step execution guide (7 steps) - Add AUDIT_RESULTS.md with detailed findings and remediation plan This project tracks the implementation and execution of the issue triage automation system to fix 250 non-compliant issues (100% missing type labels, milestones, DoR/DoD sections). * docs(projects): add CONTINUATION_PROMPT.md for next chat sessions Adds comprehensive continuation prompt to active project folder for use in new chat sessions when continuing work on PR #1377 and Phase 2 execution. Includes: - Current project status and branch references (feat/issue-triage-automation-enhancements) - Epic #1376 and child issues #1378-#1385 - Phase 2 execution steps with exact commands - All relevant documentation locations - Success criteria and verification checklists - Quick reference commands This file allows seamless handoff between chat sessions while maintaining full context of the implementation and execution plan. * chore(changelog): add entry for issue triage automation system (#1377) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
Add Phase 3.2 documentation files for integration testing execution:
These documents support the labeling-governance.yml consolidation verification.
Test Plan Scenarios
All test procedures and success criteria documented in PHASE_3.2_TEST_PLAN.md.
Definition of Ready
Definition of Done