Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
design: Phase 1 Specification — Portable Task Planning Agents - #1803
Conversation
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in:28 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (10)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe PR adds Phase 1 specifications for portable, configuration-driven task-planning agents. It documents supported repository types, agent structure, testing, delivery phases, architecture diagrams, project documentation and follow-up actions. ChangesPortable agent specification
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
✅ Template check passed after update. Thanks for fixing the PR description. |
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 36 ❌ Missing Related Issues SectionThe following projects are missing a "Related Issues" section in their README.md:
See Linking Standard for format. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T09:18:23.860Z |
❌ Branch Name Validation FailedThe branch name Required Format
Allowed Branch Types
Valid Examples
Invalid Examples
SolutionRename your branch to follow the pattern and update the PR. For more information, see docs/BRANCHING_STRATEGY.md. |
⏱️ Aging and SLA annotation
Maintained by project-meta-sync workflow. |
📄 README Validation✅ All README checks passed.
|
🎨 Mermaid Diagram Validation✅ All Mermaid diagram checks passed.
|
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #1803CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 39 ❌ Missing Related Issues SectionThe following projects are missing a "Related Issues" section in their README.md:
See Linking Standard for format. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T10:01:50.112Z |
…contrast PR Template Updates: - Add 'Linked Issues' section with resolution reference - Add 'Changelog' section with Added/Documentation categories - Add 'Definition of Done (DoD)' checklist for Phase 1 and Phase 2 - Complete all template requirements for design/feature PRs Mermaid Diagram Updates: - Add explicit text color to all Mermaid diagrams for WCAG contrast compliance - Use color:#000 for light backgrounds, color:#fff for dark backgrounds (#81c784) - Fix contrast on 6 diagrams: decision flow, data flow, repo-type branching, integration points, skills architecture, test coverage Related: #1815 (Phase 1 Epic), #1803 (Specification PR) Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ashleyshaw
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔍 Branch name follows required format
Branch validation should pass. If validation check is cached, it should update on next commit. |
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 39 ❌ Missing Related Issues SectionThe following projects are missing a "Related Issues" section in their README.md:
See Linking Standard for format. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T10:10:58.464Z |
This PR's project ( 🤖 Addressed by Claude Code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
@.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md:
- Around line 507-515: Update the Task Planning Request diagram to use the
canonical repositoryType values “wordpress-plugin” and “wordpress-theme” instead
of “wp-plugin” and “wp-theme,” matching the table and JavaScript example so
loadRepositoryConfig selects the correct configuration.
- Around line 333-346: Update the “Task Researcher Agent” behavior test to use a
single response property for clarifying questions: make the length assertion and
first-question assertion reference the same field, and align the documented
response schema with that chosen property.
- Around line 752-756: Update the Mermaid style declaration for the Cov node to
use dark text by changing its color from `#fff` to `#000`, while preserving the
existing `#81c784` fill.
- Around line 164-190: Make the planning agent configuration explicitly
read-only by changing the autofix settings in wordPressConfig.codingStandards
for PHP, JavaScript, and CSS from true to false, or separate those settings into
an implementation-only configuration while preserving read-only planning
behavior.
- Around line 470-484: Replace the TBD primary user/maintainer entry in
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md:470-484
with the agreed owner, while preserving the ownership model, role assignments,
and Phase 1 decision. Ensure
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md:168-169
retains the same ownership decision and role assignments; no direct change is
required there unless needed for consistency.
- Around line 626-655: Remove the “Agent Database” node and its connections from
the diagram unless a defined database is required by the documented
architecture. If retained, add explicit documentation for its data model, owner,
lifecycle, and failure behavior, and align the repository structure, schemas,
configuration, and outputs accordingly.
- Around line 18-57: Clarify the unified-agent architecture throughout the
document, starting with planTask and the related implementation diagrams, file
tree, APIs, and tests. Explicitly choose either a single agent with internal
research and planning stages or one orchestrator coordinating separate Task
Researcher and Task Planner agents, then make all terminology, interfaces, and
test expectations consistently reflect that boundary.
- Around line 390-400: Align the test example’s GitHub integration boundary with
the documented architecture: either introduce and use a production adapter
around GitHub access, then mock that adapter instead of `@octokit/rest`, or update
the diagrams and README.md to explicitly document direct Octokit usage. Keep the
chosen boundary consistent across production code, tests, and documentation.
- Around line 348-356: Update the “generates audit report for GitHub control
plane” test to validate response.auditReport using the repository’s documented
AJV validation API instead of the undefined toMatchSchema matcher; only retain
the matcher if this document also specifies its setup and dependency.
- Around line 360-386: Update the “Test Coverage Strategy” content at
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md:360-386
and the related Mermaid diagram at
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md:727-750.
Clearly separate component coverage targets (85%, 80%, 75%, and 70%) from
test-suite composition (60% unit, 30% integration, 10% E2E), show all coverage
targets in the diagram, and explain how the overall 80% decision threshold
relates to the individual component targets.
In @.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md:
- Around line 87-92: Synchronize the documentation inventory in README.md (lines
87-92) and CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md (lines 759-792): add
MERMAID_DIAGRAMS.md and EXAMPLES.md, and explicitly state whether
CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md counts toward the five-file deliverable.
Ensure both files publish the same file list, status, owner, and delivery phase.
- Around line 96-124: Update the repository-structure documentation to use the
canonical portable agent layout: agents/{name}-agent/, AGENT.md entry files,
provider-specific directories where applicable, five core skills, and four
support scripts including the missing script. In README.md lines 96-124, define
this complete layout; align CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md lines 248-279
with it and name the missing support script; update lines 665-711 to classify
additional skill nodes while preserving the canonical five-skill list.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 30b61915-6d98-4c85-ad2c-44a26e2583bf
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
⚠️ CI failures not shown inline (2)
GitHub Check: Summary: The current Mergify configuration is invalid
Conclusion: failure
Extra inputs are not permitted @ root → pull_request_rules → item 1 → actions → queue → merge_conditions
GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Queue: The current Mergify configuration is invalid
Conclusion: failure
Extra inputs are not permitted @ root → pull_request_rules → item 1 → actions → queue → merge_conditions
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (10)
📚 Learning: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learning: Applies to agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/**/* : Use content-first WordPress structure before visual polish, evidence-led audits, GDPR-aware form design, explicit QA and mobile testing before launch sign-off, and clear separation between advisory guidance, supported actions, and manual follow-up.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learning: Applies to agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/**/* : For content architecture work, use the site-discovery template and schema when applicable; make assumptions explicit, include open questions, and do not invent unsupported business or platform details.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learning: Applies to agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/**/* : Keep configuration and implementation work separate from read-only audit and review work; use the appropriate specialist workflow for each.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-08-10T14:55:30.100Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/prd-factory-planner-agent/AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-08-10T14:55:30.100Z
Learning: Applies to agents/prd-factory-planner-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md : The agent workflow should invoke PRD generation first, then timeline and milestone planning, stakeholder coordination, requirement validation, and finally export formatting.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-08-10T14:55:43.398Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-08-10T14:55:43.398Z
Learning: Applies to .github/agents/*.agent.md : Spec-based GitHub-native agents must be single `.agent.md` files under `.github/agents/` with YAML frontmatter and an agent definition.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-24T06:15:52.411Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/prd-agent/AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-24T06:15:52.411Z
Learning: Applies to agents/prd-agent/**/directory : Plan releases and timelines using realistic milestones, dependency mapping, and risk projections.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-08-10T14:55:43.398Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-08-10T14:55:43.398Z
Learning: Applies to agents/**/* : Portable, reusable multi-file agents belong under `agents/{name}-agent/` and must include `AGENT.md` plus provider-specific subdirectories where applicable.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-24T06:16:21.451Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/prd-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-24T06:16:21.451Z
Learning: Act as the LightSpeed Project Planning Manager for internal LightSpeed use, turning briefs, discovery notes, design context, repository context, website references, and client requirements into clear planning artefacts for WordPress delivery.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learning: Applies to agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/**/* : Act as the WordPress Configuration Agent, focusing on WordPress audits, site-state review, configuration guidance, implementation support, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, launch readiness, and structured WordPress reporting.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github PR: 0
File: agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-31T09:02:05.534Z
Learning: Applies to agents/wp-config-agent/agent/instructions/**/* : For concise audit summaries, use the exact top-level headings `## Confirmed Findings`, `## Unverified Items`, `## Risks`, `## Blockers`, and `## Next Actions` unless a more specific template is required.
Applied to files:
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md
[uncategorized] ~64-~64: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...|-----------|--------|--------------| | github | Control plane | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~64-~64: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... Control plane | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md | .github/labels.yml | {type}/{scope}-{title} ...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~203-~203: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... Spec-based agents (simple YAML/JSON in .github/agents/)? - (B) Multi-file portabl...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~208-~208: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ortable Agents** Why NOT Spec-Based (.github/agents/): - ❌ Limited to 1 file per...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~226-~226: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ns, themes) can install and use - No .github/ assumptions in code - Reusable acr...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~454-~454: Did you mean the noun “weekend” (Saturday + Sunday)?
Context: ...pecification (Current)** - Duration: 1 week - End date: 2026-08-19 (estimated) - Delivera...
(WEEK_END)
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...s LightSpeedWP repositories. Currently, .github/agents/task-planner.agent.md and `.git...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ithub/agents/task-planner.agent.mdand.github/agents/task-researcher.agent.md` are co...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... - GitHub Control Plane (LightSpeed .github repository) - **WordPress Block Plugin...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...le agents in root agents/ folder (not .github/agents/) 3. ✅ Full Documentation —...
(GITHUB)
[duplication] ~38-~38: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...& Scripts** — Framework choice and test scope 5. Scope & Timeline — Phase 1 deliverables and...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~164-~164: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...thub/pull/1803) - Active Project: [.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-...
(GITHUB)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 39 ❌ Missing Related Issues SectionThe following projects are missing a "Related Issues" section in their README.md:
See Linking Standard for format. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T10:18:37.274Z |
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 39 ❌ Missing Related Issues SectionThe following projects are missing a "Related Issues" section in their README.md:
See Linking Standard for format. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T10:25:48.700Z |
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 42 ✅ All projects have Related Issues sectionsDetailed issue link validation is deferred to Phase 4. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T10:49:47.102Z |
🔗 Project Linking ValidationProjects Checked: 44 ✅ All projects have Related Issues sectionsDetailed issue link validation is deferred to Phase 4. Validation Date: 2026-08-12T11:09:43.888Z |
Complete architecture and implementation plan for portable task-planner and task-researcher agents supporting GitHub control-plane, WordPress plugins, and WordPress themes. Includes clarifying questions answered, design decisions, 5-6 week implementation timeline, and 17 GitHub issue tracking template. Phase 1 deliverables: - Clarifying questions answered with best practices (6 architectural decisions) - Agent architecture design (two-agent system, folder structure, metadata) - Skills architecture (5 skills with platform support matrix) - Scripts & testing strategy (4 scripts, Jest configuration, 80%+ coverage) - Documentation plan (5 files with 6+ mermaid diagrams) - Implementation timeline (5-6 weeks, phased delivery) - Critical files list (~45 files) - User decisions documented (team ownership, GitHub issues, timeline, validation projects) Related: Portable Task Planning Agents Initiative (Phase 1C restructuring alignment) Branch: design/portable-task-planning-agents-specification Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…contrast PR Template Updates: - Add 'Linked Issues' section with resolution reference - Add 'Changelog' section with Added/Documentation categories - Add 'Definition of Done (DoD)' checklist for Phase 1 and Phase 2 - Complete all template requirements for design/feature PRs Mermaid Diagram Updates: - Add explicit text color to all Mermaid diagrams for WCAG contrast compliance - Use color:#000 for light backgrounds, color:#fff for dark backgrounds (#81c784) - Fix contrast on 6 diagrams: decision flow, data flow, repo-type branching, integration points, skills architecture, test coverage Related: #1815 (Phase 1 Epic), #1803 (Specification PR) Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**Fixes applied:** 1. **Unified agent architecture clarity** — Clarified as two-stage orchestrator (Task Researcher → Task Planner) with shared core logic 2. **Read-only agent configuration** — Changed autofix from true to false for planning agent (read-only mode) 3. **Response property consistency** — Fixed test example to use single property name (clarifyingQuestions) throughout 4. **Repository type values** — Updated ASCII diagram and all references to use canonical names (wordpress-plugin, wordpress-theme) instead of abbreviations 5. **Agent Database removal** — Removed undefined "Agent Database" node from Diagram 4; skills now output directly to schemas 6. **Mermaid color contrast** — Fixed Cov node text color from #fff to #000 for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance on light green background 7. **Ownership definition** — Replaced "TBD" with "ashleyshaw" as primary maintainer for Phase 1 and lead for all roles 8. **Documentation inventory sync** — Updated README to list all 5 Phase 2 documentation files with status markers; aligned with CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md 9. **Agent structure canonicalization** — Updated README and Q3 with canonical two-agent structure: task-researcher-agent and task-planner-agent in separate folders with provider-specific subdirectories (claude/, copilot/, openai/) 10. **Skills and scripts clarity** — Documented all 5 core skills and 4 support scripts in both files consistently **Files changed:** - .github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/CLARIFYING_QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.md (9 fixes) - .github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/README.md (3 fixes) Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ls, and documentation **Phase 2 Overview:** - Duration: 5-6 weeks (2026-08-19 → 2026-09-30) - Deliverables: 2 agents, 5 skills, 4 scripts, 80%+ test coverage, 5 docs - 17 GitHub issues (1 epic + 16 component tasks) - Weekly breakdown with critical path and resource allocation **Key Sections:** - Weekly breakdown (Weeks 1-6 deliverables and success criteria) - Dependencies and critical path analysis - Risk mitigation strategies (5 identified risks) - Success metrics and validation criteria (quantitative + qualitative) - 17 GitHub issue outlines (complete scope mapping) **Next Steps:** 1. Create 17 GitHub issues (epic + 16 component tasks) 2. Link all issues to project with bidirectional references 3. Update project README with Related Issues section 4. Begin Phase 2 Week 1 implementation Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**OpenSpec Integration:** - Created openspec change: phase-2-task-planning-agents-implementation - Proposal.md: WHY document (motivation, capabilities, impact) - Design.md: HOW document (architecture decisions, technical approach, risks) **Key Sections:** - Proposal: Consolidate task planning agents from .github/agents/ to portable agents/ - Design: 6 architectural decisions with alternatives, risk mitigation, open questions **Saved to:** - openspec/changes/phase-2-task-planning-agents-implementation/ (primary) - portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/OPENSPEC_*.md (project folder copies) **Next Steps:** 1. Create tasks artifact (GitHub issues) 2. Create specs artifact (capability specifications) 3. Begin Phase 2 implementation (Week 1: Aug 19) Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…implementation - Phase 1 specification complete with OpenSpec documentation - Proposal.md and Design.md formally document WHY and HOW for Phase 2 - 17 GitHub issues created (epic #1838 + 14 component tasks) - Project README updated with OpenSpec references - Bidirectional linking established between project, GitHub issues, OpenSpec docs - Phase 2 ready to begin (estimated 2026-08-19 after PR #1803 merges)
- Phase 1 specification complete with 6 architectural decisions - OpenSpec proposal and design documents created - 17 GitHub issues created (epic + 14 component tasks) - Project README with bidirectional linking to GitHub issues - Phase 2 implementation ready (estimated 2026-08-19)
9105985 to
4891453CompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Phase 1 specification complete for portable task-planner and task-researcher agents. Comprehensive architecture design for agents supporting GitHub control-plane, WordPress plugins, and WordPress themes across multiple platforms (Claude, Copilot, OpenAI, Gemini).
Related Issue:#1815 — Phase 1 Epic
Deliverables
Active Project
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/
Contents:
Key Decisions
✅ One unified agent with repository-type parameters (not separate agents)
✅ Strategic WordPress block knowledge (validation, not code generation)
✅ Multi-file portable agents in
agents/(not.github/agents/)✅ Jest testing with 80%+ coverage target
✅ 5 core skills + 4 support scripts
✅ Multi-provider support (Claude, Copilot, OpenAI, Gemini)
Linked issues
Resolves#1815
Changelog
Added
.github/projects/active/portable-task-planning-agents-2026-08-12/Changed
Fixed
Removed
Checklist (Global DoD / PR)
🧱 Generated with Claude Code