Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41

Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics

Conversation

@logancsack

@logancsacklogancsack commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path

Verification

  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check

Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:38 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:trusted PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list. size:XS labels Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack merged commit 2eaaa6c into mainJul 31, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics - #41
Merged
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Jul 31, 2026
Merged
Preserve Grok review omission diagnostics#41
logancsack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
fix/grok-review-escalation-diagnostics
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Summary
  • retain medium-verifier omission diagnostics when successful high-effort escalation replaces the verifier result
  • keep the unified report partial whenever normalized findings were omitted
  • add a regression test covering the successful escalation path
Verification
  • pnpm exec vitest run apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts (25 passed)
  • pnpm exec vp run --filter t3 typecheck (passed; pre-existing Effect suggestions only)
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • git diff --check
Follow-up to #40 for late automated review feedback.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Jul 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:38 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 49d9c76c-073e-495c-b8a8-9e56a7403d25
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc811d3 and 00eaef3.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.test.ts
  • apps/server/src/review/GrokReviewSwarm.ts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
size:XS

labels
Jul 31, 2026
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 2eaaa6c
into
mainJul 31, 2026

12 checks passed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:XSvouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack