Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47

Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged

Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/accurate-workspace-activity

Conversation

@logancsack

@logancsacklogancsack commented Aug 3, 2026•
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Problem

The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.

Solution

  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead

Verification

  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label

Impact

No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”

  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S vouch:trusted PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list. labels Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 3, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:51 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.

Changes

Managed DevPC activity display

Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A rabbit checks the workspace screen,
“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.
Uptime hops away,
Eight hours says “ago” today,
While tests guard every scene.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot suggested changes Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx

Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack merged commit 7041967 into mainAug 3, 2026
12 checks passed
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Show accurate managed workspace activity time - #47
Merged
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Aug 3, 2026
Merged
Show accurate managed workspace activity time#47
logancsack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Conversation
@logancsack
@logancsacklogancsack
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Problem
The managed workspace panel labeled guest OS uptime as Uptime. Morph preserves the guest across pause/resume, so that value can include hibernated time and look like the VM was actively running for hours.
Solution
  • replace the guest uptime row with Last activity
  • render the control plane's signed lastActivityAt value as a relative time
  • add a regression case where guest uptime is eight hours and assert the UI reports lifecycle activity instead
Verification
  • pnpm exec vp test run apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — 22 passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web typecheck — passed
  • pnpm exec vp lint apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx --report-unused-disable-directives — passed
  • pnpm exec vp fmt --check apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx — passed
  • pnpm --filter @t3tools/web build — passed
  • managed-mode loopback browser QA at 1440×1000 and 390×844 — passed; both show Last activity — 8h ago and no uptime label
Impact
No schema, security, or provider lifecycle changes. This corrects only the customer-facing interpretation of existing signed lifecycle data.
Summary by CodeRabbit
  • New Features
    • Added a “Last activity” indicator to the Managed DevPC details panel.
    • Displays activity using relative time, such as “8h ago.”
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the guest uptime display to show more relevant lifecycle activity information.
@cursor
cursorBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.
Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

size:S

vouch:trusted
PR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.
labels
Aug 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 3, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack
Warning
Review limit reached
@logancsack, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.
Next review available in:51 minutes
Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.

You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).
How can I continue?
After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.
How do review limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.
For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.
Please refer docs for additional details.
Review details
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: dd88080f-9ed7-4c13-8a43-f8101f39161c
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60ba287 and 28e1f84.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The Managed DevPC Details panel now shows relative lifecycle activity from workspace.lastActivityAt instead of telemetry uptime. Tests update bootstrap fixtures and verify activity rendering and uptime removal.
Changes
Managed DevPC activity display
Layer / File(s)Summary
Activity display and test coverage
apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx		The Details panel displays Last activity with relative time. Test fixtures accept lifecycle activity and telemetry values. Tests verify 8h ago and confirm that uptime is not displayed.
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
A rabbit checks the workspace screen,

“Last activity” now shines clear and clean.

Uptime hops away,

Eight hours says “ago” today,

While tests guard every scene.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly states the main change: showing accurate activity time for managed workspaces.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the problem, solution, verification, and impact, but omits the template headings, checklist, and UI screenshots.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  •  Create stacked PR
  •  Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  •  Create PR with unit tests
  •  Commit unit tests in branch fix/accurate-workspace-activity
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx`:
- Around line 98-122: Update the test case “reports lifecycle activity instead
of guest uptime” so lastActivityAt and telemetry.uptimeSeconds represent
different durations. Assert that the lifecycle activity timestamp’s distinct
rendered value appears, and assert the uptime-derived value is absent, while
preserving the existing labels and Uptime exclusion checks.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
  •  Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  •  Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0e376c90-6025-43d2-941d-19171d0beb05
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 335a804 and 60ba287.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
  • apps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.tsx
Comment threadapps/web/src/components/ManagedDevPcStatus.test.tsx
@logancsack
logancsack
merged commit 7041967
into
mainAug 3, 2026

12 checks passed

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot
mentioned this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
 Merged

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@coderabbitaicoderabbitai[bot]coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

size:Svouch:trustedPR author is trusted by repo permissions or the VOUCHED list.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@logancsack