Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38

Open
Open
Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38

Description

@achrinza
achrinza
opened on Nov 11, 2023

Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:

  1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
  2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api

Further discussions

With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.

Org-wide enforcement

Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).

Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.

Restricting bots' branches

TLDR: This is not fully possible.

Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.

This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.

Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.

Repositories

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
      Open
      Open
      Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
      Description
      @achrinza
      achrinza
      opened on Nov 11, 2023
      Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
      1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
      2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
      Further discussions
      With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
      Org-wide enforcement
      Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
      Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
      Restricting bots' branches
      TLDR: This is not fully possible.
      Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
      This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
      Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
      Repositories
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        No labels
        No labels
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
          Open
          Open
          Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
          Description
          @achrinza
          achrinza
          opened on Nov 11, 2023
          Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
          1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
          2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
          Further discussions
          With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
          Org-wide enforcement
          Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
          Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
          Restricting bots' branches
          TLDR: This is not fully possible.
          Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
          This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
          Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
          Repositories
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            No labels
            No labels
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
              Open
              Open
              Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
              Description
              @achrinza
              achrinza
              opened on Nov 11, 2023
              Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
              1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
              2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
              Further discussions
              With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
              Org-wide enforcement
              Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
              Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
              Restricting bots' branches
              TLDR: This is not fully possible.
              Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
              This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
              Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
              Repositories
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                No labels
                No labels
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
                  Open
                  Open
                  Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
                  Description
                  @achrinza
                  achrinza
                  opened on Nov 11, 2023
                  Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
                  1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
                  2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
                  Further discussions
                  With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
                  Org-wide enforcement
                  Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
                  Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
                  Restricting bots' branches
                  TLDR: This is not fully possible.
                  Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
                  This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
                  Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
                  Repositories
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    No labels
                    No labels
                    Type
                    No type
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
                      Open
                      Open
                      Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
                      Description
                      @achrinza
                      achrinza
                      opened on Nov 11, 2023
                      Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
                      1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
                      2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
                      Further discussions
                      With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
                      Org-wide enforcement
                      Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
                      Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
                      Restricting bots' branches
                      TLDR: This is not fully possible.
                      Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
                      This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
                      Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
                      Repositories
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        No labels
                        No labels
                        Type
                        No type
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
                          Open
                          Open
                          Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
                          Description
                          @achrinza
                          achrinza
                          opened on Nov 11, 2023
                          Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
                          1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
                          2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
                          Further discussions
                          With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
                          Org-wide enforcement
                          Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
                          Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
                          Restricting bots' branches
                          TLDR: This is not fully possible.
                          Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
                          This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
                          Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
                          Repositories
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            No labels
                            No labels
                            Type
                            No type
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets #38
                              Open
                              Open
                              Migrate Github Protected Branch/Tag Rules rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets#38
                              Description
                              @achrinza
                              achrinza
                              opened on Nov 11, 2023
                              Github Repository Rules, which has reached general-availability, is an evolution of Github Protected Branch/Tag. This issue is to track:
                              1. Converting existing Github Protected Branch/Tag rules to Github Repository Rules rulesets
                              2. Disabling the older branch protection rules and api
                              Further discussions
                              With this new solution, we should also consider the new potentials for enforcing repository security.
                              Org-wide enforcement
                              Enforcing an org-wide Github Repository Rules ruleset is only available for Github Enterprise users. However, we can consider creating a Github Action workflow in https://github.com/loopbackio/cicd to periodically poll and enforce. This would be of similar concept to our potential adoption of Peribolos (loopbackio/cicd#26).
                              Although the adoption of the OpenSSF Scorecard Action (#25) would allow us to detect non-compliance, it is not granular enough, does not have auditable self-remediation capabilities, and does not provide a single pane of glass.
                              Restricting bots' branches
                              TLDR: This is not fully possible.
                              Bots such as Renovate require push-rights to our Github repositories. However, this opens us up to third-party vendor risk where misused bot credentials can cause unwanted, destructive commit and tag modification to our repositories.
                              This is already partially-alleviated with the older Github Protected Branch/Tag feature, where we're able to mandate the creation of a pull request and restrict who can push new Git tags. However, we are not able to enforce this for the non-publishing (i.e. work-in-progress) branches which are created and deleted day-to-day.
                              Although Github Repository Rules allows layering and creation of bypass lists, it does not have an "apply to select bots/people only". This means that, even with a bypass list with non-bot members, we would still need to "bypass " the rules (i.e. "override" the rule) via the pull request page every time we want to merge. This is not ideal.
                              Repositories
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                No labels
                                No labels
                                Type
                                No type
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions