fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark: - #28

Merged
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

fix(runner): search for the substrings a review declares with mark:#28
ywy50 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-declared-mark-signals

Conversation

@ywy50

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals both give, and it could never match anything.

peek records what it finds under the built-in table's category labelshttp, sql, concurrent, seventeen of them — and matchDeclared looks a declared value up in that same map:

case "mark":
ok = s.mark[value] > 0

So a review's own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those seventeen labels. comptime is not one. The docs say "a substring found near the top of a source file"; nothing ever searched for it.

That matters more than a stray signal kind, because the declared-signals path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through --suggest-agent gauntlet at all: the built-in rules only know built-in names. A review written for a tree and keyed on a mark was silently unproposable.

Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves, recorded under their own name, in the same head reads the built-in rules already make. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each costs a pass over every head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree, where Signals is already parsed defensively.

On the calibration script. AGENTS.md asks for its number before and after any change here. It cannot produce one on this machine: it scores against recorded --suggest runs and the journal holds four runs, none of them --suggest — it exits with "no --suggest runs recorded yet: nothing to calibrate against". The structural argument is stronger than a number would be anyway: markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, so a pool declaring no mark: takes a byte-identical path, and no bundled prompt declares a Signals: line at all. A test pins that the table is neither copied nor disturbed.

Three tests: the documented mark:comptime now matches a tree containing it; a control that it does not match a tree without it (a suggester that matched every declared mark would pass the first test and be no better than the bug); and the table/cap behavior. Against the unfixed source: "a review declaring mark:comptime was not proposed for a tree containing it".

docs/RUNS.md now says where a declared mark is looked for and states the cap.

Gate: make check and make cover clean on the tree merged with main, total coverage 78.1% against the 74.0% floor.

Signals: mark:comptime is the example docs/RUNS.md and prompt.Signals
both give, and it could not work. peek recorded matches under the
built-in table's category labels -- http, sql, concurrent -- and
matchDeclared looked a declared value up in that same map, so a review's
own mark: matched only if it happened to spell one of those labels.
comptime is not one, so the documented example matched nothing, ever.
That path is the only way a project's own prompt is reachable through
--suggest-agent gauntlet, so the reviews it was written for were
silently unproposable.
Declared values now join the built-in table as searches for themselves,
recorded under their own name, which is the token matchDeclared looks
up. Bounded to 64 across the prompt set: each one costs a pass over
every file head, and the prompts come from the reviewed tree.
A pool that declares no mark: takes the identical path it did before --
markSearch(nil) returns the built-in table itself, unchanged and
uncopied -- so nothing moves for a tree that declares nothing.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 53f6af94-46b0-4260-b5e6-03abb485973a


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ywy50
ywy50 merged commit de952ab into mainAug 29, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@ywy50
ywy50 deleted the fix-declared-mark-signals branch August 29, 2026 06:25
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ywy50