Skip to content

Add draft-release workflow placeholder - #68

Merged
IgorDobryn merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
MT-22783-add-draft-release-workflow-placeholder-for-sdk-repos
Jul 7, 2026
Merged

Add draft-release workflow placeholder#68
IgorDobryn merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
MT-22783-add-draft-release-workflow-placeholder-for-sdk-repos

Conversation

@IgorDobryn

@IgorDobrynIgorDobryn commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

A workflow_dispatch workflow can only be listed and triggered once its file exists on the default branch. Merging this no-op placeholder first puts draft-release.yml on main so the workflow can be dispatched during implementation.

Changes

  • Add .github/workflows/draft-release.ymlworkflow_dispatch with a bump_type (patch/minor/major) choice input; a single job that echoes the input and exits 0.

How to test

  • Merge this PR — workflow_dispatch only appears once the workflow is on the default branch.
  • Actions tab → Draft python ReleaseRun workflow → confirm it completes green and logs the selected bump_type.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a manual release workflow to streamline creating draft Python releases with a chosen version bump type.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5cd29cc9-3d95-41da-97a9-7d00b7891939

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab72eaa and 4a7f1d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/draft-release.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/draft-release.yml is added. It is manually triggered via workflow_dispatch with a required bump_type input (patch, minor, major) and contains a single placeholder job that echoes the selected bump type.

Changes

Draft Release Workflow

Layer / File(s)Summary
Draft release workflow scaffold
.github/workflows/draft-release.yml
Adds a manually triggered workflow with a bump_type input and a placeholder step that echoes the value.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops in, bump type in paw,
patch, minor, or major — pick one by law.
The workflow awakes on a manual call,
echoes the choice down the pipeline hall.
🐇 Draft release begins, one small step for all!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly summarizes the main change: adding a draft-release workflow placeholder.
Description check✅ PassedThe description covers the required Motivation, Changes, and How to test sections and is mostly complete.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch MT-22783-add-draft-release-workflow-placeholder-for-sdk-repos

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@IgorDobryn
IgorDobryn merged commit c933b63 into mainJul 7, 2026
16 checks passed
@IgorDobryn
IgorDobryn deleted the MT-22783-add-draft-release-workflow-placeholder-for-sdk-repos branch July 7, 2026 14:18
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2026
@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2026
3 tasks
This was referenced Jul 9, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@IgorDobryn@piobeny@VladimirTaytor