Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context by cgati · Pull Request #1 · mdg-private/dd-trace-java · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context - #1

Draft
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment
Draft

feat: add SQLCommenter custom fields API with thread-local context#1
cgati wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
cgati/merge-sqlcomment

Conversation

@cgati

@cgaticgati commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users to add custom metadata to SQL traces.

Features:

  • Thread-local context management for custom fields
  • Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
  • Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
  • Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
  • Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter

The implementation includes:

  • SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
  • SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
  • Integration with existing SQL comment injection
  • Exception handling with context restoration
  • Thread isolation and nested context support

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

Implements a thread-local context system for injecting custom key-value pairs
into SQL comments, similar to SLF4J MDC pattern. This allows external users
to add custom metadata to SQL traces.
Features:
- Thread-local context management for custom fields
- Scoped execution with withSQLCommentFields() pattern
- Public API in dd-trace-api with reflection-based access
- Proper URL encoding for SQL comment safety
- Comprehensive test coverage for all functionality
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing SQLCommenter
The implementation includes:
- SQLCommenterContext: Thread-local context system
- SQLCommenter API: Public interface for external users
- Integration with existing SQL comment injection
- Exception handling with context restoration
- Thread isolation and nested context support

/**
* Executes a block of code with the given context map, restoring the original context afterward.
* This method is similar to the withLoggingFields pattern from the provided Kotlin code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

provided kotlin code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks, I worked with Claude to help generate parts of this and I remembered it spat this comment out but forgot where / to remove it.

I fed in the example from https://github.com/mdg-private/monorepo/blob/main/mdg/common/src/main/kotlin/mdg/common/MDC.kt to level-set on the pattern I was describing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, had a feeling I knew where that came from. Ideally I know our goal is to try this out internally, and then get DD to accept it, so was trying to be really thorough for you. Everything else looked 👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, very much appreciated!

@glasserglasser left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks pretty good on the whole! i think we should keep the API here tiny/low-level.

if (customFields != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : customFields.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey() != null && entry.getValue() != null) {
// Account for URL encoding overhead (approximately 3x for worst case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem like the existing implementation does this for values? And it does do it for keys implicity (by calling length on the encoded version) but in practice the keys are unlikely to need much escaping... I'd ditch the multiplications? (This is just initial allocation length so there' sno correctness issue with messing this up.)

}
}

// Direct access to the context - simpler than the provider pattern

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully this ends up being the same class from the same classloader? I guess if it works it works.

* @param key the key
* @param value the value (will be converted to string)
*/
public static void put(String key, Object value) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be better to keep this patch a lot simpler and just have getCopyOfContextMap/setContextMap rather than the put/get/with APIs. Notably, to use this with Kotlin coroutine suspending functions we'll have to do something more like withLoggingFieldsSuspend which does some special stuff with Kotlin coroutine withContext and ThreadContextElement to basically implement its own version of keeping things in the context when coroutines switch off and on threads — ie, that's the only primitives we'll actually use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cgati@glasser@AlexanderMann