Skip to content

<execution>: Consider separating type and data member declarations #330

Description

As discussed here, some class definitions in <execution> (e.g.,

STL/stl/inc/execution

Lines 835 to 837 in 1980e1a

using _Target_diff = _Iter_diff_t<_RanIt>;
_Unwrapped_t<_RanIt> _Start_at;
using _Chunk_type = _Iterator_range<_Unwrapped_t<_RanIt>>;
) unconventionally intermix type and data member definitions. It would be nice if these were updated to our conventional "types - blank line - data members - blank line - member functions" layout for structs.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementSomething can be improvedfixedSomething works now, yay!

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions