LWG-3949 `atomic<bool>`'s trivial destructor dropped in C++17 spec wording

[StephanTLavavej]

LWG-3949 atomic<bool>'s trivial destructor dropped in C++17 spec wording

This is already implemented and tested, we just need to drop "(and bool)" from this comment:

STL/tests/std/tests/Dev11_0863628_atomic_compare_exchange/test.cpp

Lines 326 to 335 in 46843b3

	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<1>>>); // these struct cases (and bool)
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<2>>>); // aren't technically required to work
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<3>>>); // in the spec, but we think they should
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<4>>>); // on any reasonable implementation
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<5>>>);
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<6>>>);
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<7>>>);
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<8>>>);
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<9>>>);
	STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<bool>>);