I saw the following
|
# *** CLANG ISSUES, NOT YET ANALYZED ***
|
|
# Clang doesn't enable sized deallocation by default. Should we add -fsized-deallocation or do something else?
|
|
std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED
|
|
std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED
|
|
std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED
|
|
std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete14.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED
|
This must have narrowly missed the update in #4702, because clang now finally supports (since llvm/llvm-project@130e93c) sized allocation by default, see also here.
I saw the following
STL/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt
Lines 360 to 365 in e36ee6c
This must have narrowly missed the update in #4702, because clang now finally supports (since llvm/llvm-project@130e93c) sized allocation by default, see also here.