Skip to content

Implement LWG-3949: atomic<bool>'s trivial destructor dropped in C++17 spec wording #4204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Stephan T. Lavavej (StephanTLavavej) merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2023
Merged

Implement LWG-3949: atomic<bool>'s trivial destructor dropped in C++17 spec wording #4204

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tests/std/tests/Dev11_0863628_atomic_compare_exchange/test.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ constexpr atomic<Bytes<17>> b17_constexpr_v(Bytes<17>{});
#endif // __clang__

// Also test trivial destructors
STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<1>>>); // these struct cases (and bool)
STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<1>>>); // these struct cases
STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<2>>>); // aren't technically required to work
STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<3>>>); // in the spec, but we think they should
STATIC_ASSERT(is_trivially_destructible_v<atomic<Bytes<4>>>); // on any reasonable implementation
Expand Down