The evaluation of the Keyof Type Operator produces different results to the Pick built-in tool.

[someBrown]

Bug Report

🔎 Search Terms

Pick

🕗 Version & Regression Information

v4.5.4

⏯ Playground Link

Link

💻 Code

interface User {
 name?: string
 age?: number
 address?: string
}

type Foo<T, U = keyof T> = {
 [P in Extract<U, keyof T>]: T[P]
}

type Bar<T,U=keyof T> = Required<Pick<T, Extract<U, keyof T>>>

type Res = Foo<User, 'name'> //name: string | undefined;
type Res2 = Bar<User, 'name'> //name: string

// We can quickly address your report if:
// - The code sample is short. Nearly all TypeScript bugs can be demonstrated in 20-30 lines of code!
// - It doesn't use external libraries. These are often issues with the type definitions rather than TypeScript bugs.
// - The incorrectness of the behavior is readily apparent from reading the sample.
// Reports are slower to investigate if:
// - We have to pare too much extraneous code.
// - We have to clone a large repo and validate that the problem isn't elsewhere.
// - The sample is confusing or doesn't clearly demonstrate what's wrong.

🙁 Actual behavior

type Res = Foo<User, 'name'> //name: string | undefined;

The value evaluated for the name contains undefined

🙂 Expected behavior

type Foo<T, U = keyof T> = {
 [P in Extract<U, keyof T>]: T[P]
}

[P in Extract<U, keyof T>]: T[P] should not return undefined because Extract only narrows down the range of the keys

[jcalz]

I don’t see a bug here. The type User["name"] is string | undefined, so that’s the type of the name property of Foo<User, "name">. Homomorphic mapped types and mapped type modifiers can complicate this, but neither of those are happening in Foo.

[RyanCavanaugh]

+1 to jcalz; this behaves exactly the same as a step-by-step manual evaluation of the type

[someBrown]

new playground link

type Foo<T, U = keyof T> = {
 [P in Extract<U, keyof T>]-?: T[P]
}
type Res = Foo<User, 'name'> //name: string | undefined;

Sorry, I forgot to add the '-?' operator in type Foo. I changed the name attribute to required, why does it still return undefined?

[fatcerberus]

User["name"] evaluates to string | undefined because the property is optional. -? removes optionality in the new type, but this is separate from the evaluation of T[P], so you end up with name: string | undefined. You might consider NonNullable<T[P]>.

[ben-lau]

But there is another question: I think the ? symbol means this property is optional. So in this case, the name which is the keyof Users should be optional, but if you got this property , it has to be string not undefined as well.

[jcalz]

If you have a value u of type User, then in const n = u.name, the type of n is string | undefined. That's just how it works. Whether or not the key is present vs absent and whether or not you can actually write undefined to u.name has to do with --exactOptionalPropertyTypes (#43947) but that doesn't change things here.

[ben-lau]

All right, I missed this, thanks.