Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Support for --jsxFactory option - #12135

Merged
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Support for --jsxFactory option#12135
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat) merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
jsxFactory

Conversation

@sheetalkamat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#9582 and #12067

Comment threadsrc/compiler/types.ts Outdated
/* @internal */
export interface TypeCheckerHost {
getCompilerOptions(): CompilerOptions;
getJsxFactoryEntity(): EntityName;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this feels odd. i would rather we parsed the jsxFactory string one more time in the checker instead.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Do we still need typescript@next for this? https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Roadmap says it's landed, but I'm seeing

error TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'jsxFactory'.

in 2.1.1.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The roadmap says it is in typescript@next. the issues (#9582 and #12067) are marked with milestone TypeScript 2.1.3 which is not TypeScript 2.1.1 and has not shipped yet.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not sure the roadmap makes that clear. The heading "2.1 (November 2016)" reads like those features have already shipped in 2.1.0, especially since they have little checkmarks next to them. Someone would have to scroll all the way to the bottom to realize the checkmarks are meant to connote "next" features.

Moreover, the PR linked from the Roadmap doesn't have a version label/milestone attached to it.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

At the bottom of the roadmap page, there is an explanation that the checkmark means it is available in typescript@next.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did not mean to sound pedantic. just wanted to make sure the process is clear. questions are always welcomed.

@appsforartists

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I saw that, but only after your first response. It never occurred to me to scroll to the bottom of the page until you said "The roadmap says it is in typescript@next".

Have you considered putting the checkbox descriptor at the top? How about making your roadmap more granular (e.g. change the Nov heading to 2.1.1: stable and have a heading above it for next)?

I don't mean to be nit picky, but I'm sure I'm not the last person who will misread the current Roadmap.

@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thanks for the tip. moved the note to the top. and will consider having better naming for milestones in the future.

@microsoftMicrosoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sheetalkamat@appsforartists@mhegazy