Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Run jake in interactive mode so output isn't lost. - #2048
Conversation
Hi Jon (@jbondc), I'm your friendly neighborhood Microsoft Pull Request Bot (You can call me MSBOT). Thanks for your contribution! TTYL, MSBOT; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Doesn't seem right, accidentally committed test code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is this return for? Should we just eliminate this function if we don't need it anymore?
Jason Freeman (JsonFreeman)
commented
Feb 16, 2015
What effect does this have? |
Jon (jbondc)
commented
Feb 16, 2015
Oops the 'return' was accidental. I'll add 'interactive' to exec() as well. |
Jon (jbondc)
commented
Feb 16, 2015
Ahh, looks like it uncovered two bugs :) (a) Third argument: syntacticClassifierAbsent: boolean ? |
Jason Freeman (JsonFreeman)
commented
Feb 16, 2015
Daniel Rosenwasser (@DanielRosenwasser) is looking into syntacticClassifierAbsent |
We've decided that this parameter should no longer be optional. #2051. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Indent back a a level (i.e. this should only be 4 spaces from the beginning-of-line)
Try pulling in recent changes and update the PR. |
Fix jake perftsc
Jon (jbondc)
commented
Feb 18, 2015
Reopened in another pull request, no idea why build is failing. |
No description provided.