Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add type definitions for Uint8Array to/from base64 methods - #61696
Conversation
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
May 13, 2025
This PR doesn't have any linked issues. Please open an issue that references this PR. From there we can discuss and prioritise. |
dontwanttothink
commented
May 13, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
dontwanttothink
commented
Jul 1, 2025
Filipe Medeiros (filipesmedeiros)
commented
Sep 3, 2025
Officially shipped in Chrome 140 |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Sep 22, 2025
This PR needs a merge from main in order to be mergable. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Sep 30, 2025
This all seems fine, but, double checking: TypeScript Bot (@typescript-bot) test it |
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 30, 2025
Hey Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), the results of running the DT tests are ready. Everything looks the same! |
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 30, 2025
Jake Bailey (@jakebailey) Here they are:tscComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 30, 2025
Jake Bailey (@jakebailey) Here are the results of running the top 400 repos with tsc comparing Everything looks good! |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, I missed something here; the options bags need to have explicit | undefined annotation in addition to ? to indicate that passing an explicit undefined is okay (versus requiring it be "missing").
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
dontwanttothink
commented
Oct 3, 2025
Hopefully this is better. Thank you for taking the time to review the changes. |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Oct 3, 2025
FWIW we don't usually make tests for |
I see. Should I? Out of curiosity, what is the 'cases/conformance/esnext' directory for (in that case)? |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Oct 3, 2025
It used to be for emit, but I think I missed the added test for Atomic in #61646. |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM but need to double check that the extra file is the right solution.
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Oct 3, 2025
Going to just take this as-is. When they are in ES2025 (or later?), these files will get deleted anyway (see also #58573). |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jonathan Lennox (JonathanLennox)
commented
Oct 15, 2025
Can this be backported to release-5.9? |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Oct 15, 2025
No, we do not backport features to old versions in patches. |
See #61695, which this pull request attempts to fix
Fixes#61695