[Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204

Closed
#34936
Closed
[Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
#34936
Assignees
JacksonLei123
Labels
feature-api-testing

Description

@fdm-mateco
fdm-mateco
opened on Jan 3, 2025

🚀 Feature Request

When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).

const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

Example

No response

Motivation

It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:

await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

feature-api-testing

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
     blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

    Skip to content
    [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
    Closed
    #34936
    Closed
    [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
    #34936
    Assignees
    JacksonLei123
    Labels
    feature-api-testing
    Description
    @fdm-mateco
    fdm-mateco
    opened on Jan 3, 2025
    🚀 Feature Request
    When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
    const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

    Example
    No response
    Motivation
    It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
    await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

    Metadata
    Metadata
    Assignees
    Labels
    feature-api-testing
    Type
    No type
    Projects
    No projects
      Milestone
      No milestone
      Relationships
      None yet
      Development
      No branches or pull requests
      Issue actions
      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

      Skip to content
      [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
      Closed
      #34936
      Closed
      [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
      #34936
      Assignees
      JacksonLei123
      Labels
      feature-api-testing
      Description
      @fdm-mateco
      fdm-mateco
      opened on Jan 3, 2025
      🚀 Feature Request
      When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
      const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

      Example
      No response
      Motivation
      It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
      await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      Labels
      feature-api-testing
      Type
      No type
      Projects
      No projects
        Milestone
        No milestone
        Relationships
        None yet
        Development
        No branches or pull requests
        Issue actions
        
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

        Skip to content
        [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
        Closed
        #34936
        Closed
        [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
        #34936
        Assignees
        JacksonLei123
        Labels
        feature-api-testing
        Description
        @fdm-mateco
        fdm-mateco
        opened on Jan 3, 2025
        🚀 Feature Request
        When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
        const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

        Example
        No response
        Motivation
        It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
        await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

        Metadata
        Metadata
        Assignees
        Labels
        feature-api-testing
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

          Skip to content
          [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
          Closed
          #34936
          Closed
          [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
          #34936
          Assignees
          JacksonLei123
          Labels
          feature-api-testing
          Description
          @fdm-mateco
          fdm-mateco
          opened on Jan 3, 2025
          🚀 Feature Request
          When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
          const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

          Example
          No response
          Motivation
          It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
          await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          Labels
          feature-api-testing
          Type
          No type
          Projects
          No projects
            Milestone
            No milestone
            Relationships
            None yet
            Development
            No branches or pull requests
            Issue actions
            
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

            Skip to content
            [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
            Closed
            #34936
            Closed
            [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
            #34936
            Assignees
            JacksonLei123
            Labels
            feature-api-testing
            Description
            @fdm-mateco
            fdm-mateco
            opened on Jan 3, 2025
            🚀 Feature Request
            When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
            const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

            Example
            No response
            Motivation
            It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
            await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

            Metadata
            Metadata
            Assignees
            Labels
            feature-api-testing
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
              Closed
              #34936
              Closed
              [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
              #34936
              Assignees
              JacksonLei123
              Labels
              feature-api-testing
              Description
              @fdm-mateco
              fdm-mateco
              opened on Jan 3, 2025
              🚀 Feature Request
              When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
              const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

              Example
              No response
              Motivation
              It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
              await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              Labels
              feature-api-testing
              Type
              No type
              Projects
              No projects
                Milestone
                No milestone
                Relationships
                None yet
                Development
                No branches or pull requests
                Issue actions
                
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                Skip to content
                [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext #34204
                Closed
                #34936
                Closed
                [Feature]: add failOnStatusCode to requestContext#34204
                #34936
                Assignees
                JacksonLei123
                Labels
                feature-api-testing
                Description
                @fdm-mateco
                fdm-mateco
                opened on Jan 3, 2025
                🚀 Feature Request
                When defining a (manual) API request context, one should be able to define failOnStatusCode. This should cause all requests done through this context to apply the flag (unless overridden).
                const context = await request.newContext({
baseURL: 'https://example/api/',
extraHTTPHeaders: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.TOKEN}`,
},
failOnStatusCode: true
});

                Example
                No response
                Motivation
                It will prevent repetitive code, as we'll no longer have to add the property on every API call as is now:
                await this.context.get('contactpersons', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('addresses', { failOnStatusCode: true });
await this.context.get('customers', { failOnStatusCode: true });

                Metadata
                Metadata
                Assignees
                Labels
                feature-api-testing
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions