Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add Core Primitive Working Group - #172
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Pulumi PreviewClick to expand preview output |
dsp-ant
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 20, 2026 22:39
dsp-ant
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2026
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requested by David Soria Parra · Slack thread
Before / After
Before: There is no modeling for a Core Primitive Working Group — no role id, no GitHub team, no Discord role, and no members assigned to it.
After: A
core-primitive-wgGitHub team exists nested under theworking-groupsparent team, with a synced Discord role ("core primitive working group (synced)"). Its initial members are the working group leads: kurtisvg (Kurtis Van Gent) and dsp-ant (David Soria Parra).How
Mirrors the existing working-group convention (same shape as the filesystems-wg modeling in #171):
src/config/roleIds.ts: addedCORE_PRIMITIVE_WG: 'core-primitive-wg'to the Working Groups section.src/config/roles.ts: added a role entry creating GitHub teamcore-primitive-wgunderWORKING_GROUPSplus the synced Discord role.src/config/users.ts: addedROLE_IDS.CORE_PRIMITIVE_WGto the existingmemberOflists of kurtisvg and dsp-ant. Both members already existed; no new user entries were needed. The schema has no per-working-group lead distinction, so leads are modeled as plain members.No calendar/facilitator role was granted, matching the precedent set on filesystems-wg.
npm run checkpasses (33 passed, 0 failed).Open items
kurtisvgentry already present inusers.ts(Kurtis Van Gent), so nothing new needed verification.Generated by Claude Code