Skip to content

Refresh ROADMAP.md for the shipped 2026-07-28 support - #519

Merged
koic merged 1 commit into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
koic:update_roadmap_for_2026_07_28
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

Refresh ROADMAP.md for the shipped 2026-07-28 support#519
koic merged 1 commit into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
koic:update_roadmap_for_2026_07_28

Conversation

@koic

@koickoic commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

The roadmap predates the 2026-07-28 implementation work and has drifted from the released SDK. The 2026-08-15 SEP-1730 tier audit flagged the drift while evaluating the roadmap requirement:

The refreshed text records the implemented spec revisions and how the 2026-07-28 revision actually shipped, and keeps the tasks extension (SEP-2663, #391) and the removal of legacy-era support as the remaining tracked items. Gem versions are deliberately not named: the roadmap describes the current state of the SDK, and the version-to-revision mapping already lives in CHANGELOG.md.

How Has This Been Tested?

Documentation-only change; no code paths are affected. Statements were cross-checked against the v1.2.0 CHANGELOG entry and the 2026-08-15 tier audit results (server 67/67 and client 50/50 scored conformance across the 2025-11-25 and 2026-07-28 requirement sets).

Breaking Changes

None. This only updates ROADMAP.md.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Motivation and Context
The roadmap predates the 2026-07-28 implementation work and has drifted from the released SDK.
The 2026-08-15 SEP-1730 tier audit flagged the drift while evaluating the roadmap requirement:
- "Current Status" claims only 2025-06-18 and 2025-11-25 support, but the SDK now completes
the 2026-07-28 revision and passes all scored server and client conformance scenarios for each
revision's requirement set.
- The SEP-2575 stateless lifecycle rewrite was described as reserved for 2.0,
but it shipped during 1.x with both lifecycle eras served side by side;
the few incompatible adjustments shipped in a minor release under the spec-conformance
and security exceptions described in VERSIONING.md, as recorded in the 1.2.0 CHANGELOG entry.
- Deprecation warnings for Roots/Sampling/Logging (SEP-2577) were described as future work
but have shipped (modelcontextprotocol#406, modelcontextprotocol#516).
- The documentation section undersold the coverage: all implemented non-experimental features are
documented with examples (modelcontextprotocol#472, modelcontextprotocol#515).
The refreshed text records the implemented spec revisions and how the 2026-07-28 revision actually shipped,
and keeps the tasks extension (SEP-2663, modelcontextprotocol#391) and the removal of legacy-era support as the remaining tracked items.
Gem versions are deliberately not named: the roadmap describes the current state of the SDK,
and the version-to-revision mapping already lives in CHANGELOG.md.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Documentation-only change; no code paths are affected. Statements were cross-checked against the v1.2.0 CHANGELOG entry
and the 2026-08-15 tier audit results (server 67/67 and client 50/50 scored conformance across the 2025-11-25
and 2026-07-28 requirement sets).
## Breaking Changes
None. This only updates ROADMAP.md.
@koic
koic merged commit ad73154 into modelcontextprotocol:mainAug 15, 2026
11 checks passed
@koic
koic deleted the update_roadmap_for_2026_07_28 branch August 15, 2026 03:16
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@koic