refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests - #239

Closed
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main
Closed

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests#239
ala-dojo wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
ala-dojo:main

Conversation

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

refactor: restructure macro crate code and add tests

Motivation and Context

Changes:

  • Split tool.rs into separate focused modules for better organization
  • Broke down large functions into smaller, readable helper functions
  • Added comprehensive test coverage for new code paths
  • No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

Benefits:

  • Improved code readability and maintainability
  • Better test coverage ensures reliability

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit tests

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

No changes to original logic - purely structural improvements

@4t145

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you very much for your work, but we are considering a major refactoring of the tool macros, so I am afraid that your works will be overwritten soon.

Anyway, a good file organization is very important.

I'm not sure whether is it worth your time to continue investing in this. We had some discussion in #195, I think it would be better if we focus on the new implementation.

@ala-dojo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for your reply.
That's not a problem, i did this restructuring to help me understand how the macro tool works.
I will make sure to follow the mentioned thread.
Have a good day.

@jokemanfire

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your work , I think you must merger the #261 ,and rework, Feel free to open new pr.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ala-dojo@4t145@jokemanfire