[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835 - #1133

Merged
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

[auth] Adjust scope management to line up with SEP-835#1133
pcarleton merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
pcarleton/scopes-835

Conversation

@pcarleton

@pcarletonpcarleton commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation and Context

When writing the conformance test: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#36, I discovered 2 issues with our scope management:

  • We don't set the auth header in the requireBearer middleware
  • We don't use scopes_supported from the PRM in the scope passing

How Has This Been Tested?

Added conformance tests

Breaking Changes

This lines us up with the specification

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pcarleton
pcarleton marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 18, 2025 14:07
@pcarleton
pcarleton merged commit 2e67eb5 into mainNov 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@pcarleton
pcarleton deleted the pcarleton/scopes-835 branch November 18, 2025 17:30
pcarleton added a commit to antogyn/typescript-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
Resolved conflicts in src/client/auth.ts and test/client/auth.test.ts:
- Kept v1.x scope precedence for authorization URL (from SEP-835/modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Added resourceMetadata to registerClient call in DCR fallback path
- Removed duplicate auth URL scope test (already covered by modelcontextprotocol#1133)
- Kept registerClient scopes_supported test from modelcontextprotocol#757
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pcarleton@felixweinberger