Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception by gotamm · Pull Request #1329 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception - #1329

Closed
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception
Closed

fix: add UnsupportedCapabilityError to handle capabilities custom exception#1329
gotamm wants to merge 8 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
gotamm:supported-capabilities-custom-exception

Conversation

@gotamm

@gotammgotamm commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace generic Error with UnsupportedCapabilityError when capabilities are not supported, allowing applications to distinguish capability errors from actual failures.

Motivation and Context

It fixes the issue #430

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

There are no breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Added UnsupportedCapabilityError class in packages/core/src/types/types.ts.
I assigned to it an error code of -32043 following what's been done before, but it should be checked if it's correct.

Open Source Saturday

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3086e54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Dec 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@1329

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@1329

commit: 3086e54

@gotamm
gotamm marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 14:49
@gotamm
gotamm requested a review from a team as a code ownerDecember 20, 2025 14:49

@KKonstantinovKKonstantinov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this. The idea if differentiating on various Errors is something we should apply in other places too so users can distinguish them easier.

I've left two comments to be addressed please

Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
Comment threadpackages/core/src/types/types.ts Outdated
@gotamm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi @KKonstantinov, I think this PR is no longer needed and should be closed due to #1454.
Am I right?

felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2026
Follow-up to #1454. Converts the 6 capability-assertion call sites that
were missed to throw SdkError(SdkErrorCode.CapabilityNotSupported, ...)
instead of plain Error:
- Client.assertCapability() in packages/client/src/client/client.ts
- assertToolsCallTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (2 throws)
- assertClientRequestTaskCapability() in experimental/tasks/helpers.ts (3 throws)
Fixes#430Closes#1329
Co-authored-by: Matteo Gobbo <info@matteogobbo.it>
@felixweinberger

felixweinberger commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @gotamm for following up - opened #1761 to finish the SdkError conversion that #1454 started, covering the 6 call sites your audit identified (including Client.assertCapability() and the task helpers). Added you as co-author. Closing this in favor of that PR since it uses the now-standard SdkError + enum pattern.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gotamm@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov