Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature by felixweinberger · Pull Request #2248 · modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature - #2248

Merged
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

fix(types): restore task wire types removed with the task feature#2248
felixweinberger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fweinberger/restore-task-wire-types

Conversation

@felixweinberger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Restores the 2025-11-25 task wire types removed in #2128: task schemas and inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions, the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability key, type guards, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY. The task feature removal stands as behavior-only — no handlers, methods, or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests now receive -32601 (method not found) instead of failing parse.

Motivation and Context

Tasks are part of the released 2025-11-25 protocol revision. An SDK that supports 2025-11-25 must tolerate the task wire vocabulary from peers (capabilities.tasks, tool execution.taskSupport, task-augmented requests) even without implementing the feature. #2128 removed one layer too much; this restores the wire-contract layer only, byte-identical to the pre-#2128 sources except for exports of deleted behavior modules.

How Has This Been Tested?

Full suite green: core/server/client unit tests, e2e matrix 1233 cells with 0 unexpected failures (identical to baseline). New interop assertions: tasks/get parses through the request union, task-augmented tools/call retains task, execution.taskSupport and capabilities.tasks accepted by validation.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

The restored code is a verbatim partial revert of #2128's type-surface hunks, so review can be done by provenance. One deliberate inclusion: TaskCreationParams returns with the rest (it was an early-draft extra not in the released 2025-11-25 schema) — kept for byte-provenance; trivially trimmable if preferred.

The task feature removal stands as behavior-only: no handlers, methods,
or stores return, and inbound tasks/* requests receive -32601. The wire
surface defined by the 2025-11-25 protocol revision is restored so the
SDK interoperates cleanly with peers on that revision: task schemas and
inferred types, task members of the request/result/notification unions,
the optional task augmentation on request params, the tasks capability
key, the isTaskAugmentedRequestParams guard, and RELATED_TASK_META_KEY.
@felixweinberger
felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 2, 2026 14:32
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4991a7d

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
NameType
@modelcontextprotocol/coreMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/serverMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/clientMinor
@modelcontextprotocol/expressMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/fastifyMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/honoMajor
@modelcontextprotocol/nodeMajor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-newBot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

@modelcontextprotocol/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/client@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/codemod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/codemod@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/express@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/fastify@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/hono@2248

@modelcontextprotocol/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/node@2248

commit: 4991a7d

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixweinberger@KKonstantinov