Skip to content

[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33

Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged

[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

Conversation

@heimanba

@heimanbaheimanba commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.

Why

AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.

Behavior / risk

High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.

Validation

  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.

@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot found potential problems Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts Fixed
@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba merged commit 9ee0f7f into mainJul 19, 2026
16 checks passed
@heimanba
heimanba deleted the codex/maintainer-friendly-gates branch July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer
@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate by heimanba · Pull Request #33 · modelstudioai/OpenAgentPack · GitHub
Skip to content
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate - #33
Merged
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Jul 19, 2026
Merged
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate#33
heimanba merged 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/maintainer-friendly-gates
Conversation
@heimanba
@heimanbaheimanba
commented
Jul 19, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Add a lightweight evidence check for changes to provider contracts, configuration/schema parsing, release/package files, dependencies, and GitHub workflows.
  • Keep ordinary documentation, examples, and small isolated changes free of this extra merge barrier.
  • Add a maintainer review guide and make the check part of the existing Gate.
Why
AI-assisted contributions can produce a large, plausible diff quickly. This gives maintainers a concise statement of the behavior and validation evidence before reviewing high-blast-radius changes, without requiring AI disclosure, a design document, or an Issue for routine contributions.
Behavior / risk
High-risk PRs without a non-empty ## Behavior / risk and ## Validation section now fail the aggregate Gate. Low-risk paths continue to pass without those sections. The evidence check itself is included in the existing policy-surface protection.
Validation
  • bun run verify:push
  • bun test scripts/pr-evidence.test.ts
  • bun test --timeout 20000 scripts/open-source.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck:scripts
  • Parsed .github/workflows/ci.yml with Ruby YAML and ran git diff --check.
@heimanba
[policy] feat(maintainers): add risk-based PR evidence gate
01cb843
Change-Id: I6fca63510c1953053a0feddd77b4bdff29c64191
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-securityBot
found potential problems
Jul 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadscripts/pr-evidence.ts
Fixed

@heimanba
fix(ci): accept spaced PR evidence sections
7355ff6
Change-Id: I8a21b384a5d0a18f8069becce1464cefaa1250ae
@heimanba
heimanba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:19
@heimanba
heimanba
merged commit 9ee0f7f
into
mainJul 19, 2026

16 checks passed

@heimanba
heimanba
deleted the

codex/maintainer-friendly-gates

branch
July 19, 2026 07:20
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


1 more reviewer

@github-advanced-securitygithub-advanced-security[bot]github-advanced-security[bot] left review comments
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@heimanba@github-advanced-security