Skip to content

Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31

Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open

Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom
afk11:rpc-integration-test

Conversation

@afk11

@afk11afk11 commented Dec 23, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.

It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.

Let me know what you think!

@afk11
afk11force-pushed the rpc-integration-test branch from 6631d13 to d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11

afk11 commented Dec 23, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes

@afk11
afk11force-pushed the rpc-integration-test branch from d98de4d to beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11

afk11 commented Apr 13, 2018•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)

I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.

@JoshuaEstes

JoshuaEstes commented May 25, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode by afk11 · Pull Request #31 · nbobtc/bitcoind-php · GitHub
Skip to content
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode - #31
Open
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Open
Integration tests with bitcoin in regtest mode#31
afk11 wants to merge 1 commit into
nbobtc:2.xfrom 
afk11:rpc-integration-test
Conversation
@afk11
@afk11afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PRing this for your consideration - noticed some weird errors from bitcoind when you send an unknown RPC command, figured it could be interesting to run integration tests against bitcoind for certain cases. For now it's just a small test that the client gets something back from the server.
It's a separate issue for now, my motivation towards this kind of test is it allows us to test the library against a spectrum of bitcoind versions eventually. We could consider adding handling of bitcoind errors (named exceptions for the various error codes), and at least remain sure that we've implemented the right stuff.
Let me know what you think!
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
6631d13 to
d98de4dCompareDecember 23, 2017 15:18
@afk11
afk11
commented
Dec 23, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any idea why the tests aren't running? @JoshuaEstes
@afk11
afk11force-pushed
the
rpc-integration-test
branch
from
d98de4d to
beeec07CompareDecember 29, 2017 17:03
@afk11
afk11
commented
Apr 13, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Bump :) Any thoughts either way about this one? Just remembered it was open. I can add tests covering more cases if you'd like them, for now this PR is probably incomplete (a poc for now)
I actually made a package for spawning regtest nodes now, so can refactor out that stuff from here.
@JoshuaEstes
JoshuaEstes
commented
May 25, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Not sure why, it's something I'll need to look into once I get the time.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@afk11@JoshuaEstes