TruthTableOption

The TruthTableOption is a Swift protocol which helps both Devs and QAs on writing human-readable and easy editable tests. It's applicable anywhere you can synthesize your logic with a Table Of The Truth.

Example and applicable scenario

Imagine a scenario like the following one: You have to write and test a new feature which tells you whether you need to display a new banner containing a discount code to the users. You have been told from your business analyst that you only have to show the new banner in your app when:

1. The customer gender is female
2. Is a new customer or is the international women's day

After discussing with your QAs you end up with the following ACs

newCustomer	isInternationalWomensDay	isFemale	Result
false	false	false	false
false	false	true	false
false	true	false	false
false	true	true	true
true	false	false	false
true	false	true	true
true	true	false	false
true	true	true	true

Developing a feature like that, requires different layers of logic which have to be fully tested. Pretty sure you'd like to avoid writing single tests for each scenario. Moreover, in future, you should be able to extend this feature without trying to understand how the logic works. Debugging gets harder as big as the table and the requirement grows

This can be reduced to something like this:

and here's where the TruthTableOption comes to rescue.

Usage

• Create an enum which has a String as RawValue and conforms to TruthTableOption.
• Add a case for each column of the table.
• Implement passingScenarios in the following manner:
  • For each row where the result is true
    • .true when the condition should be true
    • .false when the condition should be false
    • .dontCare when the condition could be both true or false

enumPromoBanner:String,TruthTableOption{staticvarpassingScenarios:[Set<TruthTableOptionDescriptor<PromoBanner>>]=[[.true(.isFemale),.true(.newCustomer)],[.true(.isFemale),.true(.isInternationalWomensDay)],[.true(.isFemale),.true(.newCustomer),.true(.isInternationalWomensDay)]]case newCustomer
case isInternationalWomensDay
case isFemale
}

Test file

Let's assume the following mock object

finalclassPromoBannerMock:PromoBannerInterface{var_isNewCustomer:Bool=falsevar_isInternationalWomensDay:Bool=falsevar_isFemale:Bool=falsevarisNewCustomer:Bool{return _isNewCustomer
}varisInternationalWomensDay:Bool{return _isInternationalWomensDay
}varisFemale:Bool{return _isFemale
}}

and the following test

func testPromoBanner(){
// Get the full table of truth and iterate for each row
foroptionRowinPromoBanner.fullOptionTable {
// Set up the mock object with the current row
configureState(with: optionRow)testScenario(with: optionRow)}}privatefunc configureState(with optionRow:PromoBanner.Row){
promoMock._isNewCustomer = optionRow.contains(.newCustomer)
promoMock._isInternationalWomensDay = optionRow.contains(.isInternationalWomensDay)
promoMock._isFemale = optionRow.contains(.isFemale)}privatefunc testScenario(with optionRow:MarioBonusLevel.Row){
// The result from the manager
letexpectedResult= manager.shouldShowBanner
// The result from the table of the truth
letresult= optionRow.result
XCTAssertEqual(result, expectedResult,"Expected result \(expectedResult) instead \(result)")}

Inspiration

If you are interested in the followed approach, take a look at

• Table Of The Truth
• Karnaugh map

---

License

MIT license

• Copyright 2018 © Annino De Petra