Skip to content

do not forgot to store the second displayname portion - #13187

Merged
skjnldsv merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/noid/ldap-misses-store-2n-displayname-portion
Dec 21, 2018
Merged

do not forgot to store the second displayname portion#13187
skjnldsv merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/noid/ldap-misses-store-2n-displayname-portion

Conversation

@blizzz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Given your LDAP configuration defined a "Second displayname" attribute (e.g.) that is show behind the main one in brackets, then user listings and logins will create a cascade of system addressbook updated, because in one code path we missed to consider the second attribute when storing the displayname in the database. This fixes it. A final update will happen to end up with the correct value.

otherwise it causes a chain reaction of system addressbook updates
Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>
@skjnldsv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Failure unrelated

@skjnldsv
skjnldsv merged commit c2d75dd into masterDec 21, 2018
@skjnldsv
skjnldsv deleted the fix/noid/ldap-misses-store-2n-displayname-portion branch December 21, 2018 11:39
@ChristophWurst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

so … backport?

@skjnldsv

skjnldsv commented Dec 21, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ChristophWurst backport to stable15

@ChristophWurst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

and 14 and 13? The commit that causes theses issues was backported as well.

@blizzz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to stable15

@blizzz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to stable14

@blizzz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to stable13

@backportbot-nextcloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

backport to stable15 in #13218

@backportbot-nextcloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

backport to stable14 in #13219

@backportbot-nextcloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

backport to stable13 in #13220

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to reviewWaiting for reviewsbugfeature: ldap

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@blizzz@skjnldsv@ChristophWurst