Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[stable19] fix possible leaking scope in WorkFlow - #22410
Merged
Conversation
- a configured flow can be brought into consideration, despite its event was not fired - it could either run through - or run into a RuntimeException and killing processing of valid flows Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>
backportbot-nextcloudBot
requested review from
ChristophWurst, blizzz, juliusknorr, nickvergessen and rullzerAugust 25, 2020 08:42
blizzz
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2020
Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>
juliusknorr
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2020
ChristophWurst
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2020
Merged
Merged
aignerat
commented
Sep 16, 2020
Member
adjusted headline, because Flow alone could be mistaken for loginFlow |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚠️ This backport had conflicts and is incomplete ⚠️ backport of #22359