Skip to content

SCSSCacher - Lock should not be removed - #23488

Merged
MorrisJobke merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/noid/no-lock-removal-scss-cacher
Oct 16, 2020
Merged

SCSSCacher - Lock should not be removed#23488
MorrisJobke merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/noid/no-lock-removal-scss-cacher

Conversation

@MorrisJobke

@MorrisJobkeMorrisJobke commented Oct 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is within the failed lock acquiring branch. So the lock is free by another process and should not be removed because the cached file (that was created by the process having the lock) appeared on the filesystem.

This is part of multiple PRs. I just split them into their smallest independent parts. Other parts: #23478#23490

@MorrisJobke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to stable20

@MorrisJobke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to stable19

@MorrisJobke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to stable18

@ChristophWurstChristophWurst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bit unsure if this is right, can't quite wrap my head around it but I'd say worth a try on an effected production instance

This is within the failed lock acquiring branch. So the lock is free by another process and should not be removed because the cached file (that was created by the process having the lock) appeared on the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
@MorrisJobke
MorrisJobkeforce-pushed the fix/noid/no-lock-removal-scss-cacher branch from 266a00c to 9273436CompareOctober 16, 2020 08:02
@MorrisJobkeMorrisJobke added 4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish and removed 3. to review Waiting for reviews labels Oct 16, 2020
@MorrisJobke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Rebased to fix the conflict with #23490

@MorrisJobkeMorrisJobke mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2020
@juliusknorrjuliusknorr mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4. to releaseReady to be released and/or waiting for tests to finishbugtechnical debt🧱 🤔🚀

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@MorrisJobke@ChristophWurst@juliusknorr@skjnldsv