Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
fix: max width of editor container on mobile - #4337
Merged
Merged
Conversation
1 failed and 2 flaky tests on run #10400 ↗︎
Details:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| Open test.md in viewer > See test.md in the list | OutputScreenshots | |
sync.spec.js • 1 flaky test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| Sync > recovers from a lost connection | OutputScreenshots | |
api/UsersApi.spec.js • 1 flaky test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| The user mention API > fetches users with valid session | OutputScreenshots | |
This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings.
juliusknorr
requested changes
Jun 21, 2023
| width: 100%; | ||
| } | ||
| @media (max-width: 670px) { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It wasn't immediately obvious to me that this is the value of --text-editor-max-width.
Maybe we can just set a max-width in the above general .editor_content rule like this to keep it simple?
.editor__content {
max-width: min(var(--text-editor-max-width,calc(100vw-16px));ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, please check again.
luka-nextcloudforce-pushed
the
bugfix/editor-max-width-on-mobile
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 21, 2023 18:33
51e8da3 to
51fd070Compareluka-nextcloudforce-pushed
the
bugfix/editor-max-width-on-mobile
branch
from
June 21, 2023 18:36
51fd070 to
20fb69eComparejuliusknorr
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
Signed-off-by: Luka Trovic <luka@nextcloud.com>
juliusknorrforce-pushed
the
bugfix/editor-max-width-on-mobile
branch
from
June 22, 2023 06:39
20fb69e to
8765b4fComparejuliusknorr
commented
Jun 22, 2023
Member
/compile |
Signed-off-by: nextcloud-command <nextcloud-command@users.noreply.github.com>
juliusknorr
commented
Jul 12, 2023
Member
/backport 8765b4f to stable27 |
juliusknorr
commented
Jul 12, 2023
Member
/backport 8765b4f to stable26 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 Summary
🖼️ Screenshots
🚧 TODO
🏁 Checklist
npm run lint/npm run stylelint/composer run cs:check)