[Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014

Open
Open
[Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014

Description

@mjang
mjang
opened on Jun 1, 2026

Describe the problem you have identified

I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.

  • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
  • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)

GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:

Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples

Which product or products does this problem relate to?

Other

If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.

No response

What is the expected or desired behaviour?

No response

Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?

No response

Any additional information

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
      Open
      Open
      [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
      Description
      @mjang
      mjang
      opened on Jun 1, 2026
      Describe the problem you have identified
      I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
      • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
      • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
      GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
      Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
      Which product or products does this problem relate to?
      Other
      If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
      No response
      What is the expected or desired behaviour?
      No response
      Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
      No response
      Any additional information
      No response
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        No labels
        No labels
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
          Open
          Open
          [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
          Description
          @mjang
          mjang
          opened on Jun 1, 2026
          Describe the problem you have identified
          I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
          • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
          • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
          GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
          Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
          Which product or products does this problem relate to?
          Other
          If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
          No response
          What is the expected or desired behaviour?
          No response
          Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
          No response
          Any additional information
          No response
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            No labels
            No labels
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
              Open
              Open
              [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
              Description
              @mjang
              mjang
              opened on Jun 1, 2026
              Describe the problem you have identified
              I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
              • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
              • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
              GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
              Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
              Which product or products does this problem relate to?
              Other
              If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
              No response
              What is the expected or desired behaviour?
              No response
              Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
              No response
              Any additional information
              No response
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                No labels
                No labels
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
                  Open
                  Open
                  [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
                  Description
                  @mjang
                  mjang
                  opened on Jun 1, 2026
                  Describe the problem you have identified
                  I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
                  • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
                  • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
                  GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
                  Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
                  Which product or products does this problem relate to?
                  Other
                  If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
                  No response
                  What is the expected or desired behaviour?
                  No response
                  Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
                  No response
                  Any additional information
                  No response
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    No labels
                    No labels
                    Type
                    No type
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
                      Open
                      Open
                      [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
                      Description
                      @mjang
                      mjang
                      opened on Jun 1, 2026
                      Describe the problem you have identified
                      I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
                      • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
                      • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
                      GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
                      Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
                      Which product or products does this problem relate to?
                      Other
                      If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
                      No response
                      What is the expected or desired behaviour?
                      No response
                      Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
                      No response
                      Any additional information
                      No response
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        No labels
                        No labels
                        Type
                        No type
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
                          Open
                          Open
                          [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
                          Description
                          @mjang
                          mjang
                          opened on Jun 1, 2026
                          Describe the problem you have identified
                          I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
                          • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
                          • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
                          GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
                          Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
                          Which product or products does this problem relate to?
                          Other
                          If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
                          No response
                          What is the expected or desired behaviour?
                          No response
                          Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
                          No response
                          Any additional information
                          No response
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            No labels
                            No labels
                            Type
                            No type
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014
                              Open
                              Open
                              [Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions#2014
                              Description
                              @mjang
                              mjang
                              opened on Jun 1, 2026
                              Describe the problem you have identified
                              I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.
                              • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
                              • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)
                              GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:
                              Did you use AI assistance?
[] No
[] Yes
If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?
Then add:
Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples
                              Which product or products does this problem relate to?
                              Other
                              If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.
                              No response
                              What is the expected or desired behaviour?
                              No response
                              Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?
                              No response
                              Any additional information
                              No response
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                No labels
                                No labels
                                Type
                                No type
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions