Skip to content

Fix tox env ordering issue - #1457

Merged
marcoskirsch merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix_tox_odering_issue
May 20, 2020
Merged

Fix tox env ordering issue#1457
marcoskirsch merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix_tox_odering_issue

Conversation

@sbethur

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

- [ ] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.

- [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Fix tox env ordering issue:

  • flake8 and docs depend on codegen
  • test depends on installers (for install_local_wheel.py --driver nitclk), not codegen
  • pkg depends on installers

List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.

None

What testing has been done?

Ran tox in serial and parallel modes and verified the ordering is correct.

- flake8 and docs depend on codegen
- test depends on installers (for `install_local_wheel.py --driver nitclk`), not codegen
- pkg depends on installers
@sbethur
sbethur requested a review from marcoskirschMay 19, 2020 18:15
@codecov

codecovBot commented May 19, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1457 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1457 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.93% 91.93% =======================================
Files 20 20 Lines 3658 3658 =======================================
Hits 3363 3363 Misses 295 295 
FlagCoverage Δ
#codegenunittests88.24% <ø> (ø)
#nifakeunittests96.40% <ø> (ø)
#nimodinstunittests95.37% <ø> (ø)
#nitclkunittests95.45% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5740196...2c8d6be. Read the comment docs.

@marcoskirschmarcoskirsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this allows us to run tox in parallel on CI, why wouldn't we want to do it?

@marcoskirsch
marcoskirsch merged commit 8564ea1 into masterMay 20, 2020
@marcoskirsch
marcoskirsch deleted the fix_tox_odering_issue branch May 20, 2020 02:36
@sbethur

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

If this allows us to run tox in parallel on CI, why wouldn't we want to do it?

I don't see a reason why not. Trying it out in #1471.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sbethur@marcoskirsch