Update the order and default values in nifake metadata

[rahulr-NI]

• This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.

- [ ] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.

- [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

This PR updates the nimi-python repository metadata files with those from NI's private repository, resolves ordering issues, and addresses default values.
It contains new APIs generated during codegen but not present in nimi-python.

What testing has been done?

Tox build is failing here as in gRPC, the abort api in generated codes is not implemented but the existing test cases are expecting it.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.72%. Comparing base (3432530) to head (d825349).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
generated/nifake/nifake/_grpc_stub_interpreter.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (3432530) and HEAD (d825349). Click for more details.

HEAD has 10 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (3432530)	HEAD (d825349)
nifgensystemtests	1	0
nimodinstsystemtests	1	0
nirfsgsystemtests	1	0
nidcpowersystemtests	1	0
nidmmsystemtests	1	0
nitclksystemtests	1	0
nisesystemtests	1	0
nidigitalsystemtests	1	0
niswitchsystemtests	1	0
niscopesystemtests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2134 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.07% 81.72% -7.35% 
==========================================
Files 71 29 -42 Lines 18960 4116 -14844 ==========================================
- Hits 16889 3364 -13525 + Misses 2071 752 -1319 

Flag	Coverage Δ
codegenunittests	84.44% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests	?
nidcpowerunittests	89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests	?
nidigitalunittests	68.44% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests	?
nifakeunittests	85.53% <50.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
nifgensystemtests	?
nimodinstsystemtests	?
nimodinstunittests	94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests	?
niscopesystemtests	?
niscopeunittests	43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests	?
niswitchsystemtests	?
nitclksystemtests	?
nitclkunittests	98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
generated/nifake/nifake/session.py	77.55% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
generated/nifake/nifake/_grpc_stub_interpreter.py	83.06% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 46 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3432530...d825349. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[marcoskirsch]

Abort is such a common function that it's strange not to include in the example/fake/test metadata

[rahulr-NI]

Yes.. Thats why I did not modify any portion of metadata that being generated from AzDo. We will need to create some stories to issues to make the necessary changes to Match AzDo version of metadata generated from AzDo to version present in GitHub. Which also should include the necessary test cases.