[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements - #663

Open
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto
Open

[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements#663
songgot wants to merge 1 commit into
nnstreamer:mainfrom
songgot:remove_goto

Conversation

@songgot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements and simplify control flow

@songgotsonggot changed the title [single] Refactor invoke_thread to remove goto statements[single] Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statementsNov 18, 2025
Comment threadc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c
Refactor invoke_thread to reduce goto statements and simplify control flow
Signed-off-by: hyunil park <hyunil46.park@samsung.com>

@myungjoo-botmyungjoo-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review (transcribed from an AI review agent's report; please verify before acting).

Summary: The PR removes the wait_for_next label from invoke_thread, renames exit to exit_thread, hoists single_h->status = status above the error/JOIN check, and turns the success path into an else branch. I traced every path in old vs new: the mutex is held on entry to every goto exit_thread, after the re-lock following __invoke, and on natural loop exit, and exit_thread unlocks exactly once. The g_cond_wait loop, invoking flag, output freeing on error/join vs __process_output on success, the alloc_output-guarded cleanup, broadcasts, and NULL in/out handling are unchanged. Merges cleanly onto current main. Existing tests (invoke_timeout, parallel_runs, close_while_running) cover all three thread paths. Minor comments only.

  1. [Low] Small semantic change not mentionedc/src/ml-api-inference-single.c:545: single_h->status = status is now also stored when state == JOIN_REQUESTED after __invoke. Harmless (a still-waiting _ml_single_invoke_internal gets the real result instead of a stale one), but the PR is described as a pure refactor. Either keep the assignment where it was (just before the if (single_h->state == RUNNING)) or mention the change in the commit message.
  2. [Low] Inaccurate comment:554/* If join requested, exit immediately without broadcast */: exit_thread does broadcast in the JOIN_REQUESTED branch, and that broadcast is required to wake ml_single_close waiting on invoking. Reword to e.g. /* Join requested: release data and broadcast at exit_thread */.
  3. [Low] Comment style / lost invariant:562/*Reset state and notify */ is missing the space after /*; and the original /* Do not set IDLE if JOIN_REQUESTED */ at the exit label was replaced by /* Cleanup resources on exit */, dropping a non-obvious invariant that ml_single_close / invoke_internal rely on. Please restore it alongside the new comment.
  4. [Low] Stale Android CI failure — the PR's Android Build Test (2025-12-26) failed on all four ABIs; logs have expired and the diff is platform-independent control flow, so this is almost certainly transient. Please rebase onto current main and re-run CI before merging.

No back-door or suspicious behavior found.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@songgot@myungjoo@myungjoo-bot