Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

Description

@trivikr

The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

Proposal

Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

Rationale

  • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
  • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
  • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
  • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
  • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

Notes

  • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
  • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
  • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

      Description

      @trivikr

      The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

      GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

      Proposal

      Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

      This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
      We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

      Rationale

      • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
      • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
      • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
      • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
      • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

      Notes

      • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
      • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
      • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

          Description

          @trivikr

          The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

          GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

          Proposal

          Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

          This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
          We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

          Rationale

          • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
          • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
          • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
          • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
          • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

          Notes

          • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
          • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
          • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

              Description

              @trivikr

              The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

              GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

              Proposal

              Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

              This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
              We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

              Rationale

              • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
              • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
              • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
              • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
              • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

              Notes

              • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
              • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
              • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

                  Description

                  @trivikr

                  The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

                  GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

                  Proposal

                  Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

                  This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
                  We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

                  Rationale

                  • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
                  • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
                  • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
                  • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
                  • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

                  Notes

                  • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
                  • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
                  • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

                      Description

                      @trivikr

                      The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

                      GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

                      Proposal

                      Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

                      This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
                      We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

                      Rationale

                      • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
                      • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
                      • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
                      • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
                      • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

                      Notes

                      • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
                      • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
                      • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

                          Description

                          @trivikr

                          The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

                          GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

                          Proposal

                          Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

                          This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
                          We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

                          Rationale

                          • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
                          • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
                          • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
                          • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
                          • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

                          Notes

                          • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
                          • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
                          • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Configure pull request limit for users without write access #1084

                              Description

                              @trivikr

                              The open pull request count on nodejs/node has grown beyond 1000+. A portion of these are from individual contributors who have a high number of open PRs at the same time, which places demands on finite collaborator review capacity.

                              GitHub provides a setting to limit the number of open pull requests from users without write access. This helps balance the need for open contribution with the reality of limited human review resources.

                              Proposal

                              Should we set a pull request limit for users without write access?

                              This idea was discussed among collaborators, and 5 was suggested as a reasonable starting point.
                              We'd like to hear broader community input before making a decision.

                              Rationale

                              • Every open PR requires collaborator time for review, feedback, and follow-up. A high volume of open PRs from a single contributor can reduce the time available to review contributions from others.
                              • With the rise of AI-assisted tooling, it is now easier than ever to generate pull requests at a higher frequency, which can outpace the capacity of human reviewers.
                              • A limit encourages contributors to prioritize their most impactful changes and work with collaborators to get existing PRs merged or closed before opening new ones.
                              • It also serves as a backstop against automated spamming attacks that open multiple PRs.
                              • Contributors who are consistently engaged at a level that requires more open PRs would be candidates for collaborator status, which is not subject to the limit.

                              Notes

                              • The limit applies only to users without write access. Collaborators are not affected.
                              • We can start with 5 (or some other number based on consensus) and re-evaluate based on feedback.
                              • GitHub also provides a "bypass list" but we propose not using it to avoid the overhead of managing additions and removals.

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions