Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
doc: Update README.md to include WIP status - #22
Conversation
Based on the EP for the stable module ABI I think an additional status would be useful to call out those which we believe are ready for final review versus those that we expect to iterate on before that final review should take place.
jasnell
commented
May 3, 2016
I've always disliked "incubating" as a status. Perhaps just "pre-draft"? |
or maybe "WIP" for work in progress ? otherwise "pre-draft" is fine with me. |
evanlucas
commented
May 4, 2016
I like WIP |
jasnell
commented
May 4, 2016
Work in progress works for me too
|
mhdawson
commented
May 4, 2016
Updated to use WIP |
mhdawson
commented
May 10, 2016
Any additional comments ? @trevnorris I know you had some on the other PR where the change had been accidentally included. |
trevnorris
commented
Jun 2, 2016
I'm not sure if I completely agree with how this works. Documents can land as DRAFT while they're being revised. A WIP to me means that the PR is asking for help to review/fix/etc. That's easily enough placed in the title of the PR. I don't like the idea of a document landing with WIP, since it denotes that it's definitely not something even potentially accepted. A document should land unless it's been agreed upon that it could be implemented. |
mhdawson
commented
Nov 3, 2017
Long since stale. node-eps has been sunset. |
Based on the EP for the stable module ABI I think
an additional status would be useful to call out
those which we believe are ready for final review
versus those that we expect to iterate on before
that final review should take place.