Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android - #1340

Merged
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

Fix: module compilation within termux-app on android#1340
refack merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
arrkiin:termux_on_android

Conversation

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Description of change

To solve the problem of linking a compiled module against a preinstalled library of termux-app on android I added a special condition branch to add the required -fPIC flag for the c and c++ compiler. After that everything compiled, linked and works as expected.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
[ 'OS == "android"', {
'cflags': [ '-fPIC' ],
'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ],
}],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can fold this into the previous condition: OS in "android freebsd ...". You don't need to add it to cflags_cc because cflags is for both C and C++ code.

@arrkiinarrkiinNov 16, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bnoordhuis thanks for your comment. Your proposal was my first attemp to fix it, but it didn't. To verify if I didn't make any mistake I just did some testing:

  • with 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it compiles
  • without 'cflags_cc': ['-fPIC' ] it does not

I think I have to compare the verbose outputs in more detail to figure out what happens. Any ideas?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env V=1 node-gyp rebuild turns on verbose compilation mode (i.e., prints the compile commands.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the compiler command for the variant without ccflags_cc. It seems that the -fPIE after the first -fPIC creates and unlinkable shared library on android.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fno-rtti ...

With ccflags_cc the command is build like that. It seems, that the later -fPIC overrides the preceding -fPIE so that it produces the right shared library.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fPIE -fPIC -fno-rtti ...

With this result I would rather try to remove the -fPIE while compiling shared libraries on android. I added an additional entry in target_condition for removing -fPIE like shown below. That did the trick and produces the following compiler command.
... -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-rtti ...

Excerpt of my local addon.gypi:

'target_conditions': [
...
['library=="shared_library"', {
'conditions': [
[ 'OS=="android"', {
'cflags!': [ '-fPIE' ],
}]
]
}],
...
]

@bnoordhuis, what is your comment on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, you're probably getting hit by #1118 - that -fPIE flag is not set by node-gyp, it's inherited from node's common.gypi.

The right thing to do until #1118 is resolved is probably to suppress the flag in node-gyp's addon.gypi.

It must have been broken for quite a while because that flag was added 20 months ago in nodejs/node#5544.

Comment threadaddon.gypi Outdated
'standalone_static_library': '<(standalone_static_library)'
}],

['library=="shared_library"', {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you want to unset -fPIE unconditionally, otherwise it's still going to be problematic with add-ons that also build static libraries.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. So we only want to remove the flag if we don't want to compile an executable. Am I right?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, thanks. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/42/

You don't even need to special-case on OS=="android" when removing -fPIE but this is good enough.

@arrkiin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bnoordhuis, when can I expect it to be merged and published?

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We don't release that often and it also takes a while for new versions of node-gyp make it into npm and node.

I can merge it but can you squash your commits and write up a nice commit log? If you want to show up under your real name instead of arrkiin, please do git commit --amend --author="...". Cheers.

@pietvanzoen

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

@arrkiin

arrkiin commented May 22, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hey @bnoordhuis, sorry for the long delay. After your message I asked myself how to proceed and forgot to continue. In the meantime I used my own fork to do the experiments under termux. Until now I didn't see any problems. Today I just found some time to squash the commits and add my forename.

@maclover7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johnnyvf24

johnnyvf24 commented Aug 14, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey folks. Would love to see this merged. Running into this issue currently. :)

I can second that.

@refack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refackrefack self-assigned this Oct 20, 2018
@refack
refack merged commit e2401e1 into nodejs:masterOct 20, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
PR-URL: #1340
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@arrkiin@bnoordhuis@pietvanzoen@maclover7@johnnyvf24@refack