doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues - #2096

Closed
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion
Closed

doc, bin: stop suggesting opening node-gyp issues#2096
bzoz wants to merge 3 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
JaneaSystems:remove-issue-sugesstion

Conversation

@bzoz

@bzozbzoz commented Apr 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
Description of change

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the module issue tracker.

It also makes the issue template more explicit about providing the logs.

A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
npm info using node@v13.9.0

Usage: npm <command>
(...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we talk about three backticks on a line by themselves above the first line of the log and the same below the last line of the log?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that people will just overwrite the example output, not paying to much attention to the backticks. We can add one more extra line here to make it easier for users to use backticks correctly.

Comment threadbin/node-gyp.js Outdated
'Try to update node-gyp and file an Issue if it does not help:',
' <https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues>'
log.error('', ['Node-gyp failed to build your package.',
'Try to update node-gyp and if it does not help file an issue with the package author'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"update node-gyp" is no trivial matter though, I think this was written even before it was bundled with npm. Maybe we should say "Try to update npm and/or node-gyp" or something along those lines? I don't think we can fit in explanations of how to make npm use an external node-gyp in this message and that's not necessarily good practice anyway.

@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Updated. PTAL

bzoz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@bzoz

bzoz commented Apr 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 5d06460

@bzozbzoz closed this Apr 16, 2020
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
A lot of new issues in node-gyp are related to outdated node-gyp or
broken modules. This removes the suggestion to open a new issue in the
node-gyp, instead suggesting the user should open the issue in the
module issue tracker. It also makes the issue template more explicit
about providing the logs.
PR-URL: #2096
Reviewed-By: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request May 26, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bzoz@rvagg@cclauss