gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

gyp should use Python 3 not Python - #2660

Closed
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python
Closed

gyp should use Python 3 not Python#2660
cclauss wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python

Conversation

@cclauss

@cclausscclauss commented May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See #2654

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Comment threadgyp/gyp
set -e
base=$(dirname "$0")
exec python "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"
exec python3 "${base}/gyp_main.py" "$@"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this variable consider python-related settings described here?
https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp#configuring-python-dependency

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My PR would effectively do what you're suggesting @biodranik. (I haven't re-reviewed my own PR in a while, so I'd want a chance to do that before/if it got merged.)

(For those familiar with the deep workings of this repo: My PR would make gyp run with the Python binary found by find-python.js... find-python.js is the script that honors all those Python binary configuration options you linked to.)

Granted, most users with a Python binary that can run gyp have it accessible on their PATH as python and/or as python3. (Or they have some compatible Python as python and/or python3 on their PATH). So for most users, my PR is not needed.

For those who don't; for the few who rely exclusively on those Python binary configuration options node-gyp offers to pass find-python.js, who don't have such a compatible-with-gyp Python binary on their PATH, it feels like the configs are a bit of a lie, and them not being used to actually run gyp is a bit of a broken promise (promise implied by the existence of the config options).

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeGMay 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... digging deeper and doing some quick testing... the file gyp/gyp modified by this PR is apparently never run by node-gyp. This file is a tiny bash script wrapper around gyp/gyp_main.py. node-gyp skips the wrapper in favor of running gyp/gyp_main.py directly.

Details

It does so here:

$ ~/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js configuregyp info it worked if it ends with okgyp info using node-gyp@9.0.0gyp info using node@16.15.0 | linux | x64gyp info find Python using Python version 3.8.10 found at "/usr/bin/python3"gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python3gyp info spawn args [gyp info spawn args '/home/[user]/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py',[ . . . ]gyp info spawn args ]

I also modified the gyp/gyp script to echo some stuff and touch a file at an absolute path, then ran node-gyp rebuild to see if anything happened. Nothing was echoed from gyp/gyp, and the file was not touched/was not present on my disk. So... I conclude the gyp/gyp script was not run by node-gyp.

(end of expanded info)

Given the above, I think this PR is fully unnecessary for the node-gyp repo, should make zero difference, as this is in a file that is not ever being run. (Might be of some use at https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next??)

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@DeeDeeGDeeDeeG left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the fix. [ EDIT: Hmm, I think this PR does nothing in the context of node-gyp. (node-gyp never runs the file changed by this PR.) I explained it in another comment here: #2660 (comment) ]

nits:

  • This change should also be done in https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next at some point.
  • This has a few extra/duplicate/irrelevant commits now (after a force push was apparently done on master branch recently).
  • Please merge this with a commit message prefix that will show on the CHANGELOG: (list here) such as fix:, gyp:, or python:. Or fix(gyp):, fix(python):...

@cclauss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of #2362

@cclausscclauss closed this Jun 10, 2022
@cclauss
cclauss deleted the gyp-should-use-Python-3-not-Python branch June 10, 2022 12:12
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cclauss@mcollina@biodranik@DeeDeeG@rubiagatra