fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13 - #2771

Merged
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

fix: increase node 12 support to ^12.13#2771
cclauss merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
npm:node-12-engines

Conversation

@lukekarrys

@lukekarryslukekarrys commented Dec 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
Description of change

npm@8 updated to node-gyp@9 which was technically a breaking change for us due to the mismatch of the lower bound of node 12 support. this was done by mistake but we opted not to revert since by the time we noticed we were more concerned that changing node-gyp versions would break more things.

changing the lower bound of node 12 to 12.13 will align with npm 8 and allow us to fix our breaking change without needing to do a bunch of back ports.

Ref #2753 (comment)
Ref npm/cli#5049 (comment)

@lukekarrys
lukekarrys marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2022 16:38
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

#2772 addresses the test failures which are unrelated to the changes in this PR

@ljharbljharb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 thank you

@lukekarryslukekarrys mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2022
2 tasks
@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/node-gyp friendly ping to help this get reviewed. ideally this could get released in 9.3.1, since i have breaking changes for review in #2770.

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 888efb9 into nodejs:mainDec 16, 2022
@lukekarrys
lukekarrys deleted the node-12-engines branch December 16, 2022 22:33
@ljharb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cclauss thanks! how soon do you think a v9 patch release could be cut?

ljharb added a commit to ljharb/aud that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/npm-lockfile that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/get-dep-tree that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ls-publishers that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lukekarrys@ljharb@cclauss