Promise eval in repl yields inaccessible object

[tomas]

• Version: v8.9.4
• Platform: Linux x64
• Subsystem: repl

I'm trying to build a custom repl that yields promises before returning the value to the user, but for some reason I'm unable to "reach" the final value, even though it does appear to be correctly assigned.

This is the code I'm using:

var repl = require('repl'),
 vm = require('vm');

function foo() {
 return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
 resolve({ success: true })
 })
}

function myEval(code, context, file, cb) {
 var res = vm.runInContext(code, context)

 if (!res || typeof res.then != 'function') // Non-thenable response
 return cb(null, res)

 res.then(function(val) {
 cb(null, val)
 }, function(err) {
 cb(err)
 })
}

var replServer = repl.start({
 eval: myEval
})

replServer.context.foo = foo;

And this is what happens:

> res = foo()
{ success: true }
> res.success
undefined
> res.constructor
[Function: Promise]

However, the "real" result does get correctly assigned to _:

> res = foo()
{ success: true }
> _.success
true

Is there something I'm missing?

Thanks!

[princejwesley]

foo() returns promise in res = foo() expression and therefore, res is a promise instance.
{ success: true } its just a REPL output expression which is specifically handled(with custom eval function) for promise instance.

> res = foo()
{ success: true }
> res <- this should return { success: true } (from custom eval)
{ success: true }

What you need is something like res = await foo(); which will be available in the future release.

Closing this ticket, feel free to reopen it.

[tomas]

@princejwesley I see, thanks for the heads up. It does seem a bit confusing though. I mean, if res is actually a Promise instance then why is the repl output showing { success: true }? Why doesn't it show the actual value that it holds?

Well, I ended up figuring it out anyway. I'm now able to get the "real" promise.then result assigned to the variable, so the repl feels synchronous and provides a much nicer experience.

[princejwesley]

@tomas Your custom eval function (myEval) handles Promise.then and emits { success: true } as output to terminal.

[tomas]

Is that a question? You can look at my original custom eval function in the OP.

The one I'm using now is way more complex.

[princejwesley]

@tomas No, its not a question. Just trying to clear the doubt part. Your custom eval function runs the expression in a given context (res is still promise instance) and decides how to emit the resulting value(res) in the terminal.

[tomas]

OK. I still don't see the point why it works like this. Shouldn't what you see be what you get?

[devsnek]

> res = foo() // res is set to calling foo which returns an unresolved promise
// `res = foo()` returns the promise as well, which is then handled with:
// res.then(function(val) {
// cb(null, val)
// ...

// which then calls back with the resolve value of the promise as the return value
{ success: true }
// however res is still set to the promise result of foo(), nothing has changed that yet

what you want is to parse the expression and perform an assignment to the variable like

res.then(function(val) {
 eval(`${variable} = val`);
 cb(null, val)
 ...

in #15566 we use acorn (a javascript syntax parser/lexer/tokenizer) to split the assignment, you can do something similar

[tomas]

@devsnek Thanks for a clearer explanation. The eval trick is actually what I'm doing now.

// however res is still set to the promise result of foo(), nothing has changed that yet

That's precisely my point. If res is still the result of foo() (the unresolved promise), then why does the repl show the result of the promised function when inspecting it? It should output something like Promise { ... }, don't you think?

[devsnek]

no, you call the callback with the resolved value ({ success: true }) not the return value of the evaluated expression (Promise { <pending> })

[tomas]

Ok, thanks, and sorry for the confusion. :)